Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "emsoft".
Did you mean:
msoft
2008 Nov 21
1
[LLVMdev] quantitative comparison of correctness of llvm-gcc 2.x versions
...does not even output structs or pointers. The goal is
> for it
> to emit the full range of constructs found in normal C programming
> practice without compromising on the "almost strictly conforming"
> thing.
Thanks John, I added this page:
http://llvm.org/pubs/2008-10-EMSOFT-Volatiles.html
-Chris
2008 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] quantitative comparison of correctness of llvm-gcc 2.x versions
Please link to the graphs if that seems appropriate-- I will leave them
there and hopefully also update them as new versions of LLVM come out.
It would be great if these graphs can serve as an advertisement for LLVM
as well as an advertisement for my work. I hope to create analogous
graphs for gcc 4.x sometime, and also to stress-test the x64 ports of both
compiler families.
There is a
2008 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] quantitative comparison of correctness of llvm-gcc 2.x versions
Unfortunately, the data in the paper doesn't show that, through no
fault of the authors :-(. It might be nice to add a qualification and
a pointer to this graph along with the paper, if John doesn't object.
--Vikram
Associate Professor, Computer Science
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
http://llvm.org/~vadve
On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>