search for: empty_clust

...c noinline int find_free_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root = orig_root->fs_info->extent_root; u64 total_needed = num_bytes; u64 *last_ptr = NULL; - u64 last_wanted = 0; struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group = NULL; - int chunk_alloc_done = 0; int empty_cluster = 2 * 1024 * 1024; int allowed_chunk_alloc = 0; - struct list_head *head = NULL, *cur = NULL; - int loop = 0; - int extra_loop = 0; + int using_hint = 0; struct btrfs_space_info *space_info; WARN_ON(num_bytes < root->sectorsize); @@ -2567,6 +2563,8 @@ static noinline int find_free_e...

...oup we were pointed at by the hint either isn''t of the correct type, or just doesn''t have the space we need, we set head to space_info->block_groups, so we start at the beginning of the block groups for this particular space info, and loop through. This is also where we add the empty_cluster to total_needed. At this point loop is set to 1 and we just loop through all of the block groups for this particular space_info looking for the space we need, just as find_free_space would have done, except we only hit the block groups we want and not _all_ of the block groups. If we come full...

...fail to find a block group, we fall back on btrfs_lookup_first_block_group so we can find the next block group, not sure if this is absolutely needed, but better safe than sorry. Also if we can''t find the block group that we need, or it happens to not be of the right type, we need to add empty_cluster since *last_ptr could point to a mismatched block group, which means we need to start over with empty_cluster added to total needed. Thank you, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Index: root/btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c ===============================================...