search for: emphasized

I''ve found 2 bugs that produce (imho) incorrect rendering results: 1) The regexp for strong (*) and bold (**) is greedy, which produces very strange results. The simplest way to show the problem is to give an example. This is the original code: ===== Strong: Lets do a little test *t* this should not be strong *u*. Bold: Lets do another test **t** this should not be bold **u**. =====

-----Original Message----- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch at stats.uwo.ca] Sent: ned 2004-10-17 15:34 To: Gorjanc Gregor Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] Plotcorr: colour the ellipses to emphasize the differences On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 02:51:58 +0200, "Gorjanc Gregor" <Gregor.Gorjanc at bfro.uni-lj.si> wrote: [removed old stuff] >>I would also like to

Hello R users! I began with R and I must say that it is really nice. I have data with a lot of variables and have a problem to extract the pattern from correlation matrix. So I tried with plotcorr and it went fine. While I was reading the help page of this function, I found that ellipse display can be even better with use of different colors (the code is bellow). However I have a problem to

Hello all, The recent change (r87656) to make Rboolean map to type 'bool', not 'int', broke some tests & made me realize I've had totally the wrong impression about what Rboolean actually is, and I suspect I'm not alone. Till now, I've assumed that like Rbyte --> RAWSXP, Rboolean is the _correct_ storage type for LGLSXP, while idioms like int *ip = LOGICAL(...)

On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:07:31 -0800 Michael Chirico <michaelchirico4 at gmail.com> wrote: > There are at least dozens of other cases on CRAN [2],[3]. Some of these involve casting an int to Rboolean. Best case, the int is compared against NA_LOGICAL beforehand, avoiding any mistake (there's at least one like that). Worst case, NA_LOGICAL is not considered before the cast, so NA will

...explicitly show that which.min actually 'giv[es] the index of the /first/ minimum or maximum respectively of x'. This will also more clearly distinguish it from which(x == min(x)) that is mentioned in the text. which.min(x) [1] 5 > which(x == min(x)) [1] 5 6 The 'first' is emphasized by italics in the Value section, while it is parenthesized in Description. I believe that the parenthesis could be removed, and 'first' possibly could be emphasized here as well. Well, well, just a small suggestion. Thank you all for your great work. Best regards, Henrik -- Henrik P...

"David Greene" <dag at hpe.com> wrote: > Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >> "Michael Kruse" <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: >> >>> I think David is not referring to the capitalization of file names, but to >>> "DUPLICATE", "WASTING", "NOT AMUSED",

I have a dataframe (x) and I'm plotting the 5th column vs the index. I also have a vector (v) with a few select points that I want to emphasize with a dot for those points > head(x) period AP EU LA NA 1 Jan 2007 0.18 0.45 0.19 3.19 2 Feb 2007 0.14 0.48 0.36 3.55 3 Mar 2007 0.14 0.42 0.46 2.61 4 Apr 2007 0.24 0.73 0.32 4.32 5 May 2007 0.19 0.60 0.32 4.40 6 Jun 2007 0.14 0.38

Hi eveybody! I've got a suggestion to think about. Although i think that the drawbacks are bigher than the advantages im goong to tell you abou my idea: My idea is another syntax for e m p h a s i z e d words. It uses two spaces before and after the emphasized part and alternating space and letter in between, just like in the sentence before. Pros: ? no symbol needed ? granny compatible ;) similar look as on old typwritten texts ? emphasis visible in raw text ? extensible with * or _ for * s t r o n g * emphasis Cons: ? cant be searched for easily ?...

Am 06.03.2017 um 14:56 schrieb Bart Coninckx via samba: >>> missed that - but must be the case because he refers to RHEL7/CentOS7 >>> which ships with 4.4.4 and not 4.1.x - anyways, the tree brelow the >>> install prefix is the same and the main part of the coniguration >>> lives below the lib folder whereever it is located and so the point >>> was just

Il 02/08/20 18:54, Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto: > On a side note, you keep emphasizing you aren't expecting an SLA.. but > all your questions are what someone asks to have in a defined SLA. I > have done the same thing in the past when things have gone badly, but > couching it in 'I am not asking' just makes the people being asked > grumpy. Better to be open and say

Dear R- list, I have some data to present with histograms. Therefore I used hist(...). I have few values with almost 80% of the frequencies (totaly 800) and some other values with low frequencies ( totaly 5 -10 ) that I want to emphasize. Therefore I want to "cut" the y-axis on 100, but I don't know how to deal with this. Thanks in advance, Michael Graber

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Niki Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a ?crit : >> >> md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions >> has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? > > > I just spent a few hours experimenting with the CentOS 7 installer in a > VirtualBox guest with

I'm looking for a book for someone completely ignorant of statistics who wishes to learn both statistics and R. I've found three possibilities, one by Verzani ("Using R for Introductory Statistics"), one by Crawley ("Statistics: An Introduction using R"), and one by Dalgaard ("Introductory Statistics with R"). Do these books have different emphases,

Dear R Users, I have the following situations to plot. x-values (times) : range from 0 to 104 (in weeks) y-values (hazards) : range from 0 to 0.5 Now I want to make a plot of time versus hazards such that in the time axis (i.e x-axis) the values 0-24 occupies half of the axis and the values 25-104 ocupies the rest of the axis. In other words I want to emphasize on first 24

Hello, I am struggling with a problem which I thought would be an easy one : bridging several channels together in a *smart* bridge. I emphasize *smart* : I want my bridge to be a native_rtp one when only two channels are involved, and switch to softmix technology when a third channel comes in. I thought I could use ConfBridge for that, but it creates a bridge that is not smart (it is of

> On 10/1/2015 6:18 AM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: > > > -Gene<<< > > Considering any editing/buffering benefits are only marginal (AFAIK) there are not benefits with the current approach.On the other hand the list of potential problems includes: > > 1) We cannot use the ubiquitous EFI PXEbc protocol forcing us to rely on the (not always present) EFI

"Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > Stefan, > > I can't tell if you're intentionally trolling, or are simply oblivious, > but to this observer you have clearly crossed well over the line of > acceptable behavior. Since you seem to have some experience in taking the point of view of a third person: do you find LLVM's

...b > > You will find lines like this: > > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > > This means that your user can be both a user and a group > > It has to be like this so that the 'Administrators' group can own > directories and files in sysvol. Very true. This can't be over-emphasized, since it seems to puzzle people: This is by design. And regarding non-existence of that group: If you do the supported thing, namely put winbind into /etc/nsswitch.conf, then this group exists. :-) Cheers - Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Na...

On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:30:00 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > that's nitpicking - a wroking setup works as i expect :-) No, its not nitpicking, the OP has an AD DC that is working as recommended, but the OP wants to also use it as a fileserver, so he needs to configure it a bit more. The only problem he really has is, he used the wrong