search for: emphasising

>>> I'd like to emphasise in the latter one: "This option also relaxes the precision of >>> commonly used math functions." >> >> Isn't this the "libm" flag that is proposed in this thread? > > I don't know. I didn't see any definition of it. > > In my case I'm talking about allowing the use of lower precision but

> On 21 Feb 2019, at 12.23, Hajo Locke via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good solution for many usecases. Same setup we use many years. > We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this setup. creating mailboxes, managing mailboxes, creating automated filterrules, backupsystem to tell something of

Hi llvm-dev, Every now and then, when building a direct ``CallInst`` either from IRBuilder or through ``Create*``, I have a latent bug because the calling convention (CC) expected by the function is not set on the call, and I need to manually call ``setCallingConv``. Now, from LangRef#calling-conventions, The calling convention of any pair of dynamic caller/callee must match, or the

I just read the http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/VncHeadlessInstall, and it was easy to follow and worked like a charm, I wasn't aware of the anaconda stuff... And a suggestion: could the fact that the netboot iso is just 9 megs big be emphasise... and maybee link to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalRepos as a tips to save bandwith net installs? /Mats

Hi, I am trying to understand how the biplot.prcomp is constructed so I can manipulate it to emphasise particular observations and reduce the number of variables shown. The prcomp model I have ran has cor=TRUE and scale=TRUE I have worked out from looking at str(prcomp.model) that... prcomp.model$x = the observations ploted in the biplot prcomp.model$rotation = the variables that form the

...-userlist-15001.txt clients=15001 pass=SECRETPASSWORD But CPU load is only reaching 20. I put an mbox containing 67 messages into ~/mail/dovecot-crlf So what is the best way to put a really heavy load on an imap server? The documentation describes testing correctness of the server without really emphasising performance. I would like to do something like dnsperf, which adds a linearly increasing load until the server is unable to cope. This machine has 24G RAM and 8 cores. I'll be grateful for any constructive suggestions. -- Nick Urbanik http://nicku.org nicku at nicku.or...

> It might be clearer, instead of using 'libm', to use something like 'trans' (for transcendental functions). That does seem clearer. ‘trans’ is definitely good with me. -Warren From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ristow, Warren; Bruce Hoult Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Trouble when suppressing a

On 10/02/2017 11:10 AM, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev wrote: > Is there anything that means, in particular, "go fast, even if it > means not all bits are significant"? > > I'm currently working on an llvm-based compiler for a GPU that is > optomised for OpenGL, where 16 bit FP may not be quite accurate enough > (or may be in some cases), but 32 bit FP is overkill. A

...ly make the language more deceptive, because if newcomers think {} is LLVM's spelling for C's void, they might be tempted to use {}* for C's void*, and nothing will stop them except mysterious bugs if they do arithmetic. On the purity side, replacing void with {} has the side effect of emphasising an odd asymmetry in the language. Conisder the return types of functions returning 0, 1, 2, and 3 etc. values: 0: {} 1: i32 2: {i32,i32} 3: {i32,i32,i32} etc. Why is 1 special-cased? Argument lists don't have a corresponding special case, after all. Dan

Am 13.06.2020 um 18:06 schrieb Michael Keuter: > So the call used Alaw as Codec. Yes, so seems it to be... It should has the better quality... But the calls done using my mobile phone in VoIP with the Asterisk have better quality as the calls done using the normal VoIP-telefon... I'm really puzzled... Luca Bertoncello (lucabert at lucabert.de)

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't > require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area: > add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > --- >

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:09PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't > require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area: > add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> > --- >

List, Long and confusing message follows... I'm facing a frustrating problem. XP clients can use resoures on the samba server by IP-address, but not by name. So, "net view \\servername" gives "access denied" but "net view \\ipaddress" gives list of shared resources. Samba server (3.2.7 sernet rpm) is a member server in W2003 domain. I emphasise that with

Hello all, I am willing to do "eliminating the void type" project. Is there anyone working on it? === Overview === The general concept is to replaced void with {}. And 'ret void' is a synonym of 'ret {} {}.' === Further Implementation Details === 1. Deleting VoidTyID 2. Deleting LLVMVoidTypeKind (one-to-one relation between VoidTyID and LLVMVoidTypeKind) 3. Use

Hi I recently gave a presentation about Automatic Differentiation (AD) and R at the Eighth Euro AD Workshop in Oxford (17/07/09). The presentation was intended as a general introduction to R and the desire for a generic AD interface for R. During the presentation I emphasised the need and the high level of interest that the R community has in developing such an interface and that input from the

Hi, I would like to have nmbd only bind to the interfaces specified in the interfaces line of smb.conf, in the same way that smbd does. When researching this I did come across a mailing list thread saying there was no use case, but I think I have one. For many years ClearOS has been providing NT4 style domains and unix-style shares. M$ upset the applecart last year with their 1803 update

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:45:41 -0000, <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Hrm. The projects document assumes that the reader is already familiar > with other LLVM build system issues. It would be better if that were > clarified. > > I suppose we could do one of two things: > > 1) Point back to the Getting Started Guide where srcdir and objdir are > more

On Saturday 13 June 2020 at 18:26:53, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Am 13.06.2020 um 18:06 schrieb Michael Keuter: > > So the call used Alaw as Codec. > > Yes, so seems it to be... > It should has the better quality... But the calls done using my mobile > phone in VoIP with the Asterisk have better quality as the calls done > using the normal VoIP-telefon... You are

On 2019-02-21 22:18, Sami Ketola via dovecot wrote: >> On 21 Feb 2019, at 12.23, Hajo Locke via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> >> wrote: >> I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good >> solution for many usecases. Same setup we use many years. >> We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this setup. >> creating

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:47:21 +0000 Nick Howitt via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > I would like to have nmbd only bind to the interfaces specified in > the interfaces line of smb.conf, in the same way that smbd does. When > researching this I did come across a mailing list thread saying there > was no use case, but I think I have one. > > For many