search for: emmel

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "emmel".

Did you mean: emiel
2005 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] Struct Types and GCC compatibility
On 12/20/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Mike Emmel wrote: > > Hi all I'm writing a direct llvm backend for gcjx a new java fronted for gcc. > > Great! > > > I'm now ready to tackle creating the structures to represnt classes I > > read the gcc 4.0 patches and it seems that the llvm struct is padded > > and...
2005 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] Struct Types and GCC compatibility
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Mike Emmel wrote: > Hi all I'm writing a direct llvm backend for gcjx a new java fronted for gcc. Great! > I'm now ready to tackle creating the structures to represnt classes I > read the gcc 4.0 patches and it seems that the llvm struct is padded > and aligned using the info from the g...
2005 Dec 20
2
[LLVMdev] Struct Types and GCC compatibility
Hi all I'm writing a direct llvm backend for gcjx a new java fronted for gcc. I'm now ready to tackle creating the structures to represnt classes I read the gcc 4.0 patches and it seems that the llvm struct is padded and aligned using the info from the gcc tree. In my case I don't have this information. I'm willing to intially let llvm align and pad the struct but its not clear
2005 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Help setting up a llvm project
...iled archives. I don't believe LLVM has this capability built into its rules, but we could add it once you've figured out the details. Note that libtool can automatically rip apart archives and recombine them into larger libraries. Read up on libtool for further information. Reid. Mike Emmel wrote: > First I'd like to let you know I've started working on porting gcjx to llvm. > Some other intrested people may help but I've just started the project. > > My first question is I'm porting gcjx over to use the llvm build > system I've successfully created...
2005 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] Help setting up a llvm project
...o want all sources in one directory. If I do something like SOURCES += aot/aotclass.cc aot/aotfactory.cc aot/mangle.cc I get the follwing error GC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=81 --param ggc-min-heapsize=95905 aot/aotclass.cc:301: fatal error: opening dependency file /media/WDC_Combo/home/memmel/GTK2.7/Qspin/Developer/Source/Languages/Core/Source/core/lib/compiler/gcjx/Debug/aot/aotclass.CXXd: No such file or directory compilation terminated. and trying to get them to had via LIBS as one big object file seems to fail also. Mike
2005 Dec 06
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM to Gcc tree convertor
I know the current gcc based frontend converts llvm trees to gcc trees. Is anyone working on a backend for llvm that generates gcc trees ? It would at least be intresting since you can run all the llvm passes and all the gcc passes. I'm not sure at what level you would want to generate generic ssa ?? Mike
2006 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
This is a interesting thread. I think this would also help with compiling scripting languages such as JavaScript/Python etc. We could keep the high level meta data and runtime binding info as language specific bytecode in the file and just have the parts that are easy to represent as compileable in the main object sections. There is no intrinsic reason for all the runtime type information to get
2006 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
...in a repository? (maybe as Tom suggested gcjx.sf.net would be an easy start - since it would not require gcc committer status). I am keen on getting LLVM support for gcj. Maybe we could also wrap the LLVM infrastructure in CNI so that the ecj compiler could be targetable to LLVM more easily. Mike Emmel schrieb: > This is a interesting thread. Thank you. > > I think this would also help with compiling scripting languages such > as JavaScript/Python etc. We could keep the high level meta data and > runtime binding info as language specific bytecode in the file and > just have th...
2006 Feb 25
3
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
Hi Reid, Reid Spencer schrieb: > I have some thoughts on this too .. > Great! > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many information >>is done by some runtime std::map<Value*,foo> stuff. Which is really >>handy at runtime, but I *had* serialization in mind when I was thinking
2006 Feb 04
1
[LLVMdev] [fwd] LLVA, TAO Intent, Morphun, DualCor
Is the source code for llva available esp the linux kernel port. Is there a project page for llva ? Mike On 2/3/06, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Misha Brukman wrote: > > I don't know the current status of the LLVA project, so I will let the > > current developers chime in. Please send all LLVM and LLVA questions to > > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu .