Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "emitschedmodel".
2017 Sep 26
0
Errors linking with LLVM 5.0 - dump() missing
...LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP added to:
include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h
dumpUses()
include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h
dumpScheduledState()
include/llvm/CodeGen/TargetSchedule.h
getResourceName()
include/llvm/MC/MCSchedule.h
Name
utils/TableGen/SubtargetEmitter.cpp
emitted code inside EmitSchedModel()
Unknown location in AArch64
This is not the end. I just lost track of what to change at this point.
Perhaps it would be easier to revert the change that hid the
dump() methods. That would have another advantage as well. Before LLVM
5.0.0, Chapel had the ability to link with an exist...
2017 Sep 26
3
Errors linking with LLVM 5.0 - dump() missing
...rInfo.h
> dumpUses()
>
> include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h
> dumpScheduledState()
>
> include/llvm/CodeGen/TargetSchedule.h
> getResourceName()
>
> include/llvm/MC/MCSchedule.h
> Name
>
> utils/TableGen/SubtargetEmitter.cpp
> emitted code inside EmitSchedModel()
>
> Unknown location in AArch64
> This is not the end. I just lost track of what to change at this point.
I guess that was to be expected with an option that didn't even have a cmake flag. I would propose to just check for LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP in the sourcecode and move the logic that...
2017 Sep 26
2
Errors linking with LLVM 5.0 - dump() missing
On 09/25/2017 06:19 PM, Matthias Braun wrote:
>
>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 6:03 PM, David Keaton via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/25/2017 02:53 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote:
>>> The dump methods can be included in the release builds anyway by enabling LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
>>
>> Is there a way to pass
2017 Sep 27
0
Errors linking with LLVM 5.0 - dump() missing
...eduler.h
> > dumpScheduledState()
> >
> > include/llvm/CodeGen/TargetSchedule.h
> > getResourceName()
> >
> > include/llvm/MC/MCSchedule.h
> > Name
> >
> > utils/TableGen/SubtargetEmitter.cpp
> > emitted code inside EmitSchedModel()
> >
> > Unknown location in AArch64
> > This is not the end. I just lost track of what to change at this
> point.
> I guess that was to be expected with an option that didn't even have a
> cmake flag. I would propose to just check for LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP in the...