search for: emitblockvardecl

...odifications to clang and would like to get some advice from experts. 1) My target supports very poor stack access so we implement "static stack". In this model, all local variables will have static storage class. I think I can take care of this in the clang::CGDecl.cpp::CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockVarDecl() 2) To improve memory usage, I also would like to add a new default attribute "overlay" to local variables (all will have static storage class as mentioned in 1). This attribute will be applied to all local variables except if the user has explicitly made the variable static in which ca...

...more appropriate for clang questions, but... > > 1) My target supports very poor stack access so we implement "static > stack". In this model, all local variables will have static storage > class. I think I can take care of this in the > clang::CGDecl.cpp::CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockVarDecl() Is there any reason not to lower these to alloca, and then have the code generator turn alloca into references to globals? That seems a more robust way to go. > 2) To improve memory usage, I also would like to add a new default > attribute "overlay" to local variables (all...

...more appropriate for clang questions, but... > > 1) My target supports very poor stack access so we implement "static > stack". In this model, all local variables will have static storage > class. I think I can take care of this in the > clang::CGDecl.cpp::CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockVarDecl() Is there any reason not to lower these to alloca, and then have the code generator turn alloca into references to globals? That seems a more robust way to go. > 2) To improve memory usage, I also would like to add a new default > attribute "overlay" to local variables (all...

On Apr 10, 3:49 pm, Dominic Hamon <dom.ha... at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Hi Dominic! > > I spent some time trying to get the test-suite running as per the > instructions here:http://www.llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html Yep. > > I was continually getting an error "No rule to make target > `Output/sse.expandfft.linked.rbc', needed by >

Hello I spent some time trying to get the test-suite running as per the instructions here: http://www.llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html I was continually getting an error "No rule to make target `Output/sse.expandfft.linked.rbc', needed by `Output/sse.expandfft.linked.bc'." Eventually, it turned out that calling configure without setting --with-llvmgccdir and having llvm-gcc