search for: emitatomicbinari

On 10 May 2014, at 16:18, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, I really agree there. I considered it recently, but decided > to leave it as an intrinsic for now (the new IR expansion pass happens > after most optimisations so there wouldn't be much benefit, but if we > did it earlier and the mid-end understood what an ldrex/strex meant, I > could

Hi, My target supports shift with amount 1 only i.e. to shift a value by 5 bits, I need to have a loop with shift in the body. Similarly for the unknown amount of shift we need to have a loop for shift. 1) How can I insert this loop in DAG for shift operation? 2) Is there a way where I can have a call to a function and later expand to the shift code? Which would be the

On 10 May 2014, at 18:14, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> The easiest solution would be to extend the cmpxchg instruction with a >> weak variant. It is then trivial to map load, modify, weak-cmpxchg to >> load-linked, modify, store-conditional (that is what weak cmpxchg was >> intended for in the C[++]11 memory model). > > That would