search for: emiiter

Hi there, I think I've found a bug in the x86 JIT. I get an assertion failure when using thread-local variables and the fast emitter. It only happens with the JIT, the fast emiiter and thread-locals. (The IR passes the verifier) Here's the failure: X86CodeEmitter.cpp:516: void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const llvm::MachineInstr&, const llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): Assertion `0 && "psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission&qu...

...; Evan > On Jun 12, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Mark Shannon wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I think I've found a bug in the x86 JIT. I get an assertion failure >> when >> using thread-local variables and the fast emitter. >> It only happens with the JIT, the fast emiiter and thread-locals. >> (The IR passes the verifier) >> >> Here's the failure: >> >> X86CodeEmitter.cpp:516: void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const >> llvm::MachineInstr&, const llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): Assertion `0 && >> "ps...

X86 JIT does not yet support TLS. Evan On Jun 12, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Mark Shannon wrote: > Hi there, > > I think I've found a bug in the x86 JIT. I get an assertion failure > when > using thread-local variables and the fast emitter. > It only happens with the JIT, the fast emiiter and thread-locals. > (The IR passes the verifier) > > Here's the failure: > > X86CodeEmitter.cpp:516: void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const > llvm::MachineInstr&, const llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): Assertion `0 && > "psuedo instructions should be...

...09, at 2:48 AM, Mark Shannon wrote: >> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I think I've found a bug in the x86 JIT. I get an assertion failure >>> when >>> using thread-local variables and the fast emitter. >>> It only happens with the JIT, the fast emiiter and thread-locals. >>> (The IR passes the verifier) >>> >>> Here's the failure: >>> >>> X86CodeEmitter.cpp:516: >>> void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const >>> llvm::MachineInstr&, const llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): As...

...39;t we run "lli -fast" on your .bc file instead of llc? Nicolas Mark Shannon wrote: > Hi there, > > I think I've found a bug in the x86 JIT. I get an assertion failure when > using thread-local variables and the fast emitter. > It only happens with the JIT, the fast emiiter and thread-locals. > (The IR passes the verifier) > > Here's the failure: > > X86CodeEmitter.cpp:516: void<unnamed>::Emitter::emitInstruction(const > llvm::MachineInstr&, const llvm::TargetInstrDesc*): Assertion `0 && > "psuedo instructions should b...