search for: emdcdevelop

...s a good point.  But it's worth noting that recompileAndRelinkFunction() and freeMachineCodeForFunction() are both vestiges of the old JIT (i.e. the "JIT" as opposed to the "MCJIT").  The old JIT is no longer actively supported. -Phil On April 26, 2014 at 9:47:05 AM, Sri (emdcdeveloper at gmail.com) wrote: Hi Fillip                  Addition to my previous mail, llvm has recompileAndRelinkFunction function , so, once we modified the llvm function, and  pass IR to recompileAndRelinkFunction , I hope it should be compiled and linked with previous one. Thanks Regards Sri. On 04...

...nd uses it to execute the Java > code in the JIT. And, we do not keep the llvm representation of Java > methods because we never reuse it (only in the AOT to generate the > llvm bitcode file). > > I hope that it helps? > Gaël > > Le 16 avr. 2014 14:19, "Sri" <emdcdeveloper at gmail.com > <mailto:emdcdeveloper at gmail.com>> a écrit : > > Hi > VMKit JIT has a function cache to store compiled IR code , > so, as soon as method is compiled , it will be stored in to > function cache. My question is , who will use this co...

Hi VMKit JIT has a function cache to store compiled IR code , so, as soon as method is compiled , it will be stored in to function cache. My question is , who will use this compiled information from function cache. Since we are jitting , the llvm translate source code in to native code and executing them . So, how we relates this function cache with JIT ? Thanks Regards Sri.

...gt; source level calls are implemented as patchpoints and WebKit does all > of the linking (and unlinking). > > Long story short, there is no shrink-wrapped solution but it's doable > if you're willing to get dirty. > > -Fil > > On Apr 25, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Sri <emdcdeveloper at gmail.com > <mailto:emdcdeveloper at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Hi >> Currently , I have doing some experimental work by using >> llvm, Is it possible to drop the machine code once it has been >> generated for particular function while program exe...

Hi Currently , I have doing some experimental work by using llvm, Is it possible to drop the machine code once it has been generated for particular function while program executing. For example some *void test(int)* function has been executed on native machine , I want to drop the code before I start execute some other function in my long running program. Thanks. With regards Sri.

Hi All I am trying to trace the execution path of J3 jvm with input of java byte code . Once java byte codes compiled in to llvm IR it will be passed to VMKit for store them . I couldn't find out which function is getting this Jitted output from *Functioncache* and executing them ? because , VMKit doesn't have an implementation of llvm Executionengine's *runFunction*

Hi Does anybody use *StartJnjvmWithJIT* from jvjvm.cpp in VMKit? Becuase , I am looking to use without JIT when we are running the Java byte code. My concern is StartJnjvmWithJIT getting three argument *int argc, char** argv, char* mainClass* - why we need to pass *argv and mainclass* arguments here? please help me on this. Regards Sri. -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi Does current llvm support dynamic optimization level for generated llvm IR which means , is it possible to monitor some function's execution pattern during the runtime and apply different optimization level for particular function using LLVM Analysis Passes. Thanks Regards Sri. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: