search for: embaffl

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "embaffl".

Did you mean: emaff
2011 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
Jakob Stoklund Olesen <jolesen at apple.com> writes: > On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:21 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > >> Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: >> >>> As the release enginerd, I would encourage you to hold off any changes >>> to TableGen until after Friday, if they can wait. :-) Of course, Jakob >>> gets the final say on
2011 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:15 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > Now I'm baffled. Do you object to the for loop in general or just doing > it before 3.0? In light of your recent embafflement, I think it is best if we take small steps. Please confirm that you have understood the message from Evan and me that we disagree with the general direction of removing redundancy from instruction definitions, and that your patches to that effect will be rejected. /jakob