Displaying 20 results from an estimated 43 matches for "emaste".
Did you mean:
maste
2018 Jul 26
2
Level of support for ARM LLD
On 26 July 2018 at 15:52, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 27 February 2018 at 09:06, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> A number of companies are shipping products based on FreeBSD/arm, on
>> v5 and up. As far as I know those using older processors are also
>> using older versions...
2023 Aug 02
1
[PATCH] ssh_config: reflect default CheckHostIP no
Checking up on this change:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 19:38, Ed Maste <emaste at freefall.freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> From: Ed Maste <emaste at FreeBSD.org>
>
> By convention settings in ssh_config are shown with a commented out
> default.
>
> Fixes: 6cb52d5bf771 ("upstream: make CheckHostIP default to 'no'...")
> ---
> ssh_...
2018 Jul 26
3
Level of support for ARM LLD
On 26 July 2018 at 18:05, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 26 July 2018 at 11:08, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 26 July 2018 at 15:52, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2018 at 09:06, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>
&g...
2018 Mar 13
1
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On 13 March 2018 at 16:51, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 7 February 2018 at 01:20, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> I've landed the patch in r324449.
>
> To confirm, this change *did not* make it into 6.0.0, correct? I'm
> looking at adding the externa...
2018 Feb 27
2
Level of support for ARM LLD
On 27 February 2018 at 05:29, Peter Smith via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I've got some downstream patches
> for v5 and v6 support (limit branch range, and use different
> instructions in stubs), however I don't think anyone has actually
> needed support yet.
For FreeBSD we're on a path to having Clang + lld as our toolchain for
all Tier-1
2017 Jan 18
4
RFC: LLD range extension thunks
On Jan 19, 2017 2:48 AM, "Ed Maste" <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
On 4 January 2017 at 13:34, Peter Smith via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I'm about to start working on range extension thunks in lld. This is
> an attempt to summarize the approach I'd like to take and what the
> impact will be on...
2015 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.5.1 assertion failure on FreeBSD when building LLDB
A change between r231216 and r231221 causes an assertion failure on
the LLDB FreeBSD bot. The compiler is FreeBSD's in-tree one: FreeBSD
clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final 225668) 20150115
First failing build:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/4668/steps/compile/logs/stdio
Assertion:
Assertion failed: ((!DD->isTrivial() ||
2015 Apr 29
3
[LLVMdev] unwind move *NOW*
On 24 April 2015 at 16:32, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote:
>
> Until a git mirror is setup, we will need to use subversion ...
What needs to happen in order to get the libunwind git mirror set up?
2017 Oct 31
2
lld: sigbus error handling
Does FreeBSD have fallocate(2) or equivalent?
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 23 October 2017 at 18:49, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW, posix_fallocate() might provide better portability and decrease the
> >> likelihood of falling back on ftruncate().
> >...
2023 Mar 21
1
Memory leak, make_absolute_pwd_glob
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 at 11:05, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> We had one more report from Coverity Scan after we brought 9.1p1 into
> the FreeBSD base system. It complains that calls like "path1 =
> make_absolute_pwd_glob(path1, *pwd);" in sftp.c leak the allocation.
I see this same issue has since been rep...
2016 Aug 16
3
LLD release note
On 13 August 2016 at 11:16, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> There's enough AArch64 to allow lld to self-host and to finish a build
> of the base system on FreeBSD. Last we (I and Rafael) checked, it was
> mid-june timeframe, but nothing changed since then.
FYI when trying to link the FreeBSD/arm64 kernel now I receive tens of
thousands of
2015 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator
On 27 May 2015 at 12:29, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
> Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes:
>> Hi Manuel,
>>
>> I like Phabricator for code review much much more than emails. Let me know how
>> I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP).
>
> Chandler updated the llvm phabricator doc to point at what we're deploying:
>
>
2019 Apr 08
3
[RFC] migrating LLVM to C++14
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 16:16, JF Bastien via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I haven’t documented FreeBSD / NetBSD / Fedora / MacOS / MSVC, and nobody complained at the BoF. I’d like to understand if we should care about documenting these: ideally the toolchain update policy would list which platforms need to be considered and how far back in time is relevant.
FreeBSD
2017 Jan 16
2
Your help needed: List of LLVM Open Projects 2017
On 16 January 2017 at 15:31, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we have any open projects on LLD?
>
> I know we usually try to avoid any big "projects" and mainly add/fix things
> in response to user needs, but just wondering if somebody has any ideas.
>
> Some really generic/simple stuff I can think of:
> 1. trying out LLD on a large program
2017 Mar 15
4
Please dogfood LLD
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Note that even if/when we get changes incorporated into libtool it
> will still take a long time for the change to appear in new releases
> of software packages using libtool. A downstream patch to the libtool
> package in various operating systems or distri...
2016 Oct 28
6
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang
On 28 October 2016 at 18:12, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> It should be possible to search the path for ld.lld first, then ld,
> but to me it seems like it will just be more confusing.
Hum, for me it would be less confusing. :)
GCC uses bfd by default, LLVM uses LLD. If you want to change, use -fuse-ld.
What would be co...
2015 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
On 30 April 2015 at 10:06, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with
>> libiomp as the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp.
>>
>>
>> For reference, the previous discussion is accessible there:
>>
2016 Apr 19
2
state of the lld linker for aarch64
On 19 April 2016 at 06:59, Renato Golin via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> Adhemerval is working on AArch64 support, and it should be mostly
> there, though some missing TLS support. He should know more.
Here's some info on TLS. Review D18960 has the initial implementation
for TLSDESC support: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18960
I've been
2016 Apr 21
2
lld and linker scripts
Hi,
I tried to use linker script with lld (this script works just file with GNU
ld). I got a problem with defining new symbols and assign values
(addresses) to them. For instance I got the following code in the linker
script:
SECTIONS
{
_exec_sym = 0;
...
After using lld command with the --script option I got the following error:
line 3: : expected, but got =
_exec_sym = 0;
^
As
2022 Nov 11
1
Memory leak, make_absolute_pwd_glob
We had one more report from Coverity Scan after we brought 9.1p1 into
the FreeBSD base system. It complains that calls like "path1 =
make_absolute_pwd_glob(path1, *pwd);" in sftp.c leak the allocation.
All make_absolute_pwd_glob() calls but one are of that form, so
perhaps have it consume and free the first arg, as below (and
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37253)?
diff --git