search for: emachin

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "emachin".

Did you mean: machin
2008 Jun 10
4
[Off Topic, kind of] eMachine model T5254
Hi list, Best Buy currently has an eMachine on sale for less than $300.00 without monitor. I didn't see any recent complaints on www.consumeraffairs.com. I didn't take the time to do a thourgh search so may have missed some. Red Hat hardware list does not have one eMachine listed. I went to eMachine's home page and found the fol...
2008 Feb 27
2
OT But I Would Rather See People Running Asterisk on a "Real" Server than an Emachine
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=8835Y11-R Use Promo Code: 8835DEAL to bring it down to $219 (plus shipping) I picked up two: 8835Y11-R -- IBM eServer 325 Dual Opteron 2.0GHz 1GB 12 2 $219.99 $439.98 (a little less than $500 for two) Thanks, Steve Totaro
2005 May 08
4
Time is Fleeting: CentOS 4 question
...r time resolution. For some reason, time on this server moves forward at a far more rapid rate. Right now, all my other systems show Sunday May 8, 3:19 pm. The CentOS server thinks its Monday May 9, 3:54 pm. I just reset it about four hours ago to the correct time. I'm using an inexpensive eMachines T6212 AMD Athon 64 processor and 1 GB RAM. Can anyone suggest a reason why this server thinks it's 25 hours in the future and growing more distant with each minute? Thanks, Bill -- Bill Diamond <bill at billdiamond.com>
2020 Mar 30
2
LLD bug causing objcopy ELF to binary generation to create large binaries
...type != isec->type) { if (!canMergeToProgbits(type) || !canMergeToProgbits(isec->type)) error("section type mismatch for " + isec->name + "\n>>> " + toString(isec) + ": " + getELFSectionTypeName(config->emachine, isec->type) + "\n>>> output section " + name + ": " + getELFSectionTypeName(config->emachine, type)); type = SHT_PROGBITS; } } if (noload) type = SHT_NOBITS; However, having said that, I think the following...
2017 Sep 19
1
Do I need to modify the AddrLoc of LLD for ARC target?
...re seeing in your print out as it doesn't quite match the map file. Looking at your source diff I think I may have found a bug: uint64_t AddrLoc = getOutputSection()->Addr + Offset; RelExpr Expr = Rel.Expr; + if ((Expr == R_PC || Expr == R_GOT_PC) && + (Config->EMachine == EM_ARC_COMPACT || + Config->EMachine == EM_ARC_COMPACT2)) { + uint64_t M = 0; + if (Type == R_ARC_32_PCREL || Type == R_ARC_PC32 || + Type == R_ARC_GOTPC32 || Type == R_ARC_GOTPC) + M = 4; // bitsize >= 32 ? 4 : 0 + AddrLoc = (getOutputSection()->...
2006 Jun 13
3
Easiest (best?) linux distribution for dedicated Asterisk box?
First off, I'm sorry for sending so many messages to the list-serv. Hopefully this will be my last for a while! I was going to use my WRT54G router as a small Asterisk box, but I forgot that I had a spare eMachines computer (Intel Celeron 633 MHz, 20GB HD, 64mb RAM). Will this machine work OK for a very simple dedicated home Asterisk box? Also, what is easiest linux distribution to use and install? All I want is a simple Asterisk box that I can telnet into and have voicemail, music-on-hold (MP3), etc...
2006 Mar 02
4
Unknown keyword in config file
I'm trying to boot Fedora Core 5 Test 3 from either CD or DVD, (which uses ISOLINUX), and I get the error messages: Unknown keyword in config file Could not find kernel image: linux boot: There are at least two other people in the world with the same problem. Unfortunately, all of the rest of the Fedora test community doesn't seem to have a problem with it, so its not a high profile
2017 Sep 18
1
Do I need to modify the AddrLoc of LLD for ARC target?
...t; documentation as this should tell you if there are any processor >>>> specific modifications to generic ELF that you have to follow. >>> >>> I implemented the MOD P for ARC: >>> >>> static void modifyARCAddrLoc(uint64_t &AddrLoc, const uint16_t EMachine, >>> RelExpr Expr, uint32_t Type, uint64_t VMA, >>> uint64_t OutSecOff, uint64_t RelOff) { >>> if (EMachine != EM_ARC_COMPACT || EMachine != EM_ARC_COMPACT2 || >>> Expr != R_PC || Expr != R_GO...
2005 May 16
3
Need off-the-shelve PC for Asterisk Server
...ations on an off-the-shelve PC for an Asterisk Server? This is for a proof of concept, so it needs to be inexpensive. I have tried 2 different PC's and had problems with the sound cards. I am thinking of PC's I can buy from local dealers like Best Buy, Office Depot. SO a cheap HP, Compaq or eMachine would work fine for me. --Steve
2010 Oct 22
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Configurable machine type in ELFObjectWriter
...as SLDG Laboratory -- Wesley Peck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101022/2bc46d2f/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: elf-emachine.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5470 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101022/2bc46d2f/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/...
2016 Jul 29
2
installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop
...on ebay, from Hong Kong with free shipping. I would > go all the way and max it out. > ===> when buying memory or hdd, i check both ebay and amazon for price, warranty and shipping. last purchases i made were all from amazon. 1 TB sata hdd, 2 ddr 1x2 GB memory and a power supply for an emachine. 1 TB sata hdd, 2 ddr 1x2 GB memory for tower box. turned out emachine had more than a power supply, so 2nd hdd and power supply went into tower box. tower box is oem mainboard for ide drives, bought an ide2sata adapter for it. now it has 2 1 TB sata drives, 1 250 GB ide and 1 ide cd/dvd r/w dr...
2016 Jul 29
3
installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop
On 7/28/2016 11:04 PM, Peter wrote: > On 29/07/16 17:13, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: >>> >>the Semperon SI-42 is, I believe, a 64 bit capable CPU, >> > >> >you are very correct. > In that case stop wasting your time with CentOS 7 i386 and install the > native x86_64 version of CentOS 7. This will give you access to all the > 3rd party repos you'll
2010 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] MC ELFObjectWriter backend refactoring
...d implemented in X86AsmBackend.cpp and ARMAsmBackend.cpp; it may be better to put these classes in their own files. 2. The ELFObjectWriter base class is declared in llvm/MC/MCObjectWriter.h; it may be better to put this declaration in its own header file. 3. Some of the flags, such as Is64Bit and EMachine, could be virtual methods instead of values passed to the base ELFObjectWriter class. 4. Refactoring of MachObjectWriter and WinCOFFObjectWriter could be done as well. 5. I could just add the MBlaze backend specific stuff into ELFObjectWriter like all of the other backends. Are their any other...
2018 Jan 25
0
Adding a new target to 'llvm-lld'
...erated trampolines between functions. - InputSection.cpp ; Support relocation calculations specific to Arm. I needed to add support for a couple of Arm specific section types to InputFiles.cpp, but otherwise the generic Elf loading parts of LLD worked without modification. Searching for Config->EMachine will give you a good idea where something custom has had to be put in for one of the targets. Stepping through run() in Writer.cpp will give you a good idea of what order LLD does various passes. Hope this helps and I'll be happy to try and answer any questions. Peter On 25 January 2018 at...
2020 Mar 29
2
LLD bug causing objcopy ELF to binary generation to create large binaries
Hi LLVM devs,  I came across an LLD bug in v 10.x where ELF parser / processor is setting .PROGBITS attribute for .heap and .stack sections, which leads to large binaries when we do `llvm-objcopy -o binary` to generate the binary output for armv6m. (e.g. for a 57Kb elf would yield a ~400Mb binary). This in comparison with LLVM 7.x , would produce the correct binary size of 35Kb and the
2018 Jan 25
4
Adding a new target to 'llvm-lld'
Hi LLVM-Devs, I am considering switching to using 'llvm-lld' instead of Gnu 'ld' in a future revision of our out-of-tree target, and I am wondering is there a getting started guide for how to go about extending 'llvm-lld' to support an additional target. Thanks, MartinO -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development
2006 Jun 14
0
Easiest (best?) linux distribution for dedicatedAsterisk box?
...ll learn a lot just making the effort. Mike John Klimek wrote: > First off, I'm sorry for sending so many messages to the list-serv. > Hopefully this will be my last for a while! > > I was going to use my WRT54G router as a small Asterisk box, but I > forgot that I had a spare eMachines computer (Intel Celeron 633 MHz, > 20GB HD, 64mb RAM). Will this machine work OK for a very simple > dedicated home Asterisk box? > > Also, what is easiest linux distribution to use and install? All I > want is a simple Asterisk box that I can telnet into and have > voicem...
2013 Aug 20
2
Really Weird Question.....
So I just got ahold of an old e-Machine (Model EL1600) with 1GB of memory. I was going to install CEntOS on it and try to run VirtualBox for other OS'es. I am curious to know if I have to stick with the 2GB "max" the specs say the machine can take or if its possible to install a 4GB module that is designed the same? In other words I have seen 2GB DDR PC2700 memory that will fit
2004 Aug 26
1
Newbie needs help - Dev_Kit_Lite installation problem
...my s100u plugged in and nother cheapo phone connected to that as well. I get a dialtone from my phone connected to my x100p with or without asterisk(I can call out and received calls like as if it was plugged straight into the wall and not through the x100p) I'm running Redhat9.0 on a P2 300Mhz emachine some more details: lsmod gives me: [root@localhost root]# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted wcusb 20064 0 (unused) wcfxo 9376 0 (unused) zaptel 178080 0 [wcusb wcfxo] cs46xx 62832 0 (autoclean)...
2018 Jan 29
0
[lld] Garbage collection of linked sections with the SHF_LINK_ORDER flag
...C and D where D is linked to C, and A == C, ICF should only merge A and C when linked sections B and D are equal too. Current implementation as you mentioned simply propogates the flag in a hacky way instead when target is ARM. And easy change for your case would be to remove "if (Config->EMachine == EM_ARM)" check at line https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lld/blob/master/ELF/ICF.cpp#L442 I believe. I do not know what way we would want to go here. +Rui and Rafael. George.