search for: elucidate

I was wondering if anyone could help me with this one. I am having trouble getting LDAP and samba working properly on my Debian Woody box. I am using OpenLDAP 2.0.27-3 and the unsable packaged Samba version 2.999+3.0 and am using the samba.schema for my LDAP database. Whenever I try to join the network using either W2K or smbclient the LDAP debug log shows that the following filter is being

I have been working on this for weeks now and feel like I am at a dead-end. I am using Samba 3.0 (Head) and OpenLDAP (2.0) and smbldap-tools 0.7 and cannot join either a Linux machine or Windows 2000 machine to the domain. If any of you have some ideas they would be much appreciated. Highlights: - I have a root defined (UID and GID of 0). - Trying to join the domain will successfully add my

Dear Valin, Please, can you explain me the mean of the routines' parameters: 1. void vq_nbest(); 2. static void compute_weighted_codebook(); 3. static inline void target_update(); 4. void split_cb_search_shape_sign(); 5. void split_cb_shape_sign_unquant(); 6. void noise_codebook_quant(); 7. void noise_codebook_unquant(); and what they do briefly??? It's very difficult understand a

Hi, Can someone set me straight as to how to write formulas in R to indicate: complete independence [A][B][C] joint independence [AB][C] conditional independence [AC][BC] nway interaction [AB][AC][BC] ? For example, if I have 4 factors: hair colour, eye colour, age, sex does > mosaicplot( frequency ~ hair + eye + age + sex) mean that the model fitted is of complete independence of

Hi a) I want to make a list out of a data.frame, where each element of the list is a column of the data.frame. I looked in the archives and saw a lot of postings but surprsingly none elucidated me. I also tried the split, aggregate help files and counldn't see any easy way to do this. I wouldn't be surprised if it's there, but I really didn't see it. I solved the problem using a very convoluted way: x <- data.frame(a=sample(10), b=sample(10), c=sample(10)) f <-...

...oni corrected post hoc tests for Two Way ANOVA in R? c. Does anyone know how post hoc tests for SPSS work in the case of Two Way ANOVAs (Univariate analysis)? Especially for Bonferroni corrected tests. I am new to R, so please let me know if I made a mistake in framing the question; I will try to elucidate as much as I personally can. Thanks for your help. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Post-Hoc-tests-for-ANOVA-tp4646710.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

My home server is running CentOS-7.1 I'm running postfix and dovecot on it. I collect email from a few sources with fetchmail and move it to ~/Maildir/cur/ with procmail. Or at least, I did do this. For some reason procmail has stopped doing its job, and the email that I collect is finishing in /var/spool/mail/tim/ I can't work out what has caused this, or what the cure is. I haven't

..., sum(clust.size[(clusters/2+1):clusters])) ) (...) } Doing this it gives me an error saying that the 'times' argument is invalid and that the cluster and treatment indicator indices are both invalid, and therefore, I'm probably defining "clust.size" wrongly?! Could you elucidate me about this?? Thanks a lot. Manny Gomez -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-the-command-%27replicate%27-tp26001367p26001367.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...ependant variable that changes with time as you would running: Kendall(d,x), where x is the exact same dataset as the x entered into MannKendall and d is the date on which the observation was made (assuming that the order is the same as the data I entered into the Kendall function). Can anyone elucidate this for me? Thanks. Billy -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Kendall-v-MannKendall-Functions-tp3394821p3394821.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

please pull git://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/mattems/klibc/.git maks for the change: maximilian attems: [klibc] simplify nuke fixes boot failures due to unexpected error returns usr/utils/nuke.c | 20 +++++--------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/utils/nuke.c b/usr/utils/nuke.c index 01b300f..9470bcf 100644 --- a/usr/utils/nuke.c +++

...denied. adding rwx to everyone, as the "software" system shows above, then the rsat work as expected (and i get the + indicating ACL has been set.) However, having my root folder sitting with rwx is rubbing me the wrong way - I don't think that is how it should be. Could someone elucidate for me what the proper unix ownership/permissions should be for my top level shares? Is there a set of acls I can apply on the unix side as part of my file system creation? I am using Samba 4.1.7 previsioned as a primary domain controller (Active directory, not NT style) -- JD Daniels

Hello R-Members, can anyone explain the difference between multiple and multivariate regression to me in terms of the terminology and eventually its respect to the mathematical foundation respectively ? Is multiple regression perhaps more related to GLM and multivariate Regression rather applied, if there are no explizit numeric factor levels ? Thanks for elucidations on that topic. Many

I'm trying to install spamassassin on a postfix/dovecot server, running CentOS-6.4, following the instructions at <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd>. I think I have taken all the steps indicated, and the configuration seems to pass the tests suggested, although the response is much more sparse than that described: ------------------------ [tim at alfred ~]$ telnet localhost 10024

I've been following the instrunctions in <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd> for installing Amavisd, Clamav and SpamAssassin on top of postfix/dovecot . Dovecot is working fine, but I want to deal with spam email. (I am using sendmail/dovecot with procmail and spamassassin on another server, but decided to go over to postfix on this server when I saw it is now the CentOS default.)

...l 4 directions. It returns variograms for 45, 90, and 135 degrees, omitting 0 degrees (pi/4, pi/2, 3pi/4, omitting 0). If I specify 0 degrees, it returns a variogram with (binned) distances of 1, 2, 3, and 4. Any ideas what I am doing wrong, or what other information I could provide to better elucidate my problem? Many thanks, as usual. Hank Stevens Dr. Martin Henry H. Stevens, Assistant Professor 338 Pearson Hall Botany Department Miami University Oxford, OH 45056 Office: (513) 529-4206 Lab: (513) 529-4262 FAX: (513) 529-4243 http://www.cas.muohio.edu/botany/bot/henry.html http://www.muohio.ed...

...ss them >> here then there is a chance, a small chance but a chance nonetheless, >> that someone at RH with a view a little broader than that evidenced in >> most of the traffic on the Fedora devel list, might take notice. > > I think this essentially sums up your point, and elucidates what I > think is the error in your thinking. Yes, it is pretty clearly an error to think anyone else cares. Red Hat will make some money on new training classes helping people cope with the breakage. And CentOS will continue to be a copy with no input. That still doesn't make it any...

...r in structure(.External(.C_dotTcl, ...), class = "tclObj") : [tcl] can't get device image. This example works fine in R-2.15.3. I've emailed the package maintainer Luke Tierney but unfortunately he doesn't have the ability to build and test packages on windows. Can anyone elucidate what tcltk changes have been made in moving to R-3.0.0? Details of installation are as follows: > version platform i386-w64-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status alpha major 3 minor 0.0 year 2013 month...

Hi All, I would like to ask a question on fixed and random effecti in lme. I am fiddlying around Mick Crawley dataset "rats" : http://www.bio.ic.ac.uk/research/mjcraw/statcomp/data/ The advantage is that most work is already done in Crawley's book (page 361 onwards) so I can check what I am doing. I am tryg to reproduce the nested analysis on page 368:

I am running Samba 3.0 HEAD with LDAP 2.0. I have ldapsam enabled buy when I try to log into my server from a W2K machine I get the following in my error log: sam_password_ok: NO NT password stored for user root. The log file shows that Samba successfully retrieved the root posixAccount record and the log displays some of the data (i.e. home directory) that is stored for root in LDAP. The

I've googled and read, and haven't run across any solutions to this problem. Yes, I know about the "Network Security: LAN Manager authentication level" change, but, as you will see, this isn't the issue. Samba 3.4.7 Windows 7 Windows machine is on a domain. Samba box is *not* on a domain. Windows insists on adding the domain to the user name when browsing to Samba