search for: eltorito_boot_imag

...ds of boot sector or partition table. > > CD/DVD booting via BIOS should ignore this area. > Well ... i am experiencing strange things with repacked archlinux > ISOs which have no MBR. So "should" might mean "does not". > Yes, we frequently see options like -b eltorito_boot_image -no-emul-boot and not -G. The reason I mentioned "-G" (instead of "-b") is because the limit of 16 sectors is mentioned under that "-G" option at http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/man/mkisofs-2.0.html So, should the eltorito_boot_image for -no-emul-boot (isolin...

...should be ISOLINUX-only, not isohybrid. Avoiding isohybrid on this testing ISO could reduce the chance that somehow the normal ISOLINUX boot sectors might be screwed up. 3_ When building the ISO image, only one set of boot parameters should be used; those for ISOLINUX only. So, only one "eltorito_boot_image", no "eltorito-alt-boot", no "-eltorito-platform"... In other words, build the testing ISO for a BIOS-only system with ISOLINUX 6.02 BIOS files only. 4_ The only purpose of this testing ISO is to identify whether ISOLINUX 6.02 behaves differently than ISOLINUX 4.07, sp...

It occured with every BIOS system I tested on (none of them Dell): 1. HP G62 laptop (i3) 2. Samsung RV520 (i3) Don't know what system Philip Muller uses; have copied him in as he has far more technical knowledge than I do. Syslinux tested from Arch and Manjaro (an Arch derivative). Basically found then when creating latest ISO images. I may be missing something as well about the FMs. Just