search for: elsayed

On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:23:51 +0000, Alex Elsayed via llvm-dev wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:44:45 +0100, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev wrote: > > <snip> > >> * How stable/fast/… is Polly today >> * We build all of AOSP with rather restrictive compile-time limits * >> Bootstrapping time of clang is reg...

hi allineed to protect files from being delete in public folder.my smb.conf file settingCode:[global] include = /etc/samba/smb_cust.conf server string = Seagate Central Shared Storage # log file = /Data/log/log.smbd max log size = 1024 log level = 0 load printers = yes printing = cups printcap name = cups cups options = raw socket options =

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 22:44:45 +0100, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev wrote: <snip> > * How stable/fast/… is Polly today > * We build all of AOSP with rather restrictive compile-time limits > * Bootstrapping time of clang is regressed by 6% (at most) > * Removal of scalar dependences is today very generic and must be > sped up in the future > * Polly still

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:13:43 -0800, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: <snip for gmane> > Heck, i could even reason about inline asm if i wanted to ;-). > > My point is that this call is super special compared to all other > calls, > and literally everything in LLVM has to understand that. > The liklihood of subtle bugs being introduced in functionality (IE >

Dear All, I have a problem in making a matrix from a data. I did a summary data from a big data frame using (ddply), the resulting table is like that: Site.No Plant.Name Cover.Percentage 1 XXX 15 1 YYY 20 2 XXX 18 2 YYY 21 3 XXX 14 3

[add subject] Dear LLVM community, hope all of you had a good start into 2018 and a quiet branching of LLVM 6.0. With the latest LLVM release out of the way and a longer development phase starting, we would like to restart the process of including Polly and isl into core LLVM to bring changes in early on before the next LLVM release. Short summary: * Today Polly is already part of each LLVM

Here is a short proposal for the hybrid storage cache idea with introduction/motivation and a bird''s eye view of an approach to implement a hybrid storage cache for btrfs. Please note that there is currently no available patches. We would like to get as much input before as possible before we start designing and implementing a solution. 1. Introduction The emerge of Solid State

Dan Williams wrote: > The consensus from LSF was that bcache need not invent a new interface > when md and dm can both do the job. As mentioned in patch 7 this series > aims to be a minimal conversion. Other refactoring items like > deprecating register_lock for mddev->reconfig_mutex are deferred. > > This supports assembly of an already established cache array: > >

On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:27:32 -0800, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: <snip> > > Great! > > You should then test that this happens, and additionally write a test > that can't be optimized away, since the above is apparently not a useful > microbenchmark for anything but the compiler ;-) > > Seriously though, there are basically three cases (with a bit of >