search for: ellington

<<pam_user.patch>> Hello. I created a patch that causes sshd to take notice of the value of PAM_USER after calling into the pam_xxx functions. This makes it possible for a PAM module to effect user mappings by setting the value of PAM_USER with pam_set_item(). If anyone has comments or suggestions, let me know. Thanks, Jeremy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Life is trying things to see if they work." Ray Bradbury ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a bug fix release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major bug fixes included in Samba 3.2.2 are: o

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Life is trying things to see if they work." Ray Bradbury ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a bug fix release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major bug fixes included in Samba 3.2.2 are: o

Hello all. It is my understanding that a PAM-aware application should check the value of the PAM_USER attribute after every PAM call.

Hello all, I have an ACT database residing on a Samba 2.0.6 server running Linux. The clients are Windows98/NT. When a user is editing a record in the database ACT will not allow another user to edit *any* record in that database. The way it is *supposed* to work is ACT should only lock the record being edited and not the whole database. This problem does not occur if the database resides on a

Hello all, I have posted this before and received no response so I am providing more info this time. I am on Linux kernel 2.2.5-15 and running Samba 2.0.6 as the Samba server. The client is a Windows NT 4.0 machine. When browsing from the NT machine (as user administrator), any share I access appears to contain the contents I put in my own share on the server. This is causing a problem because