Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "eliminatemostlyemptyblocks".
2010 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] BlockAddress is a "User"
I've been playing around with the new IndirectBr and BlockAddress types.
I'm finding that in CodeGen, during "EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks",
BlockAddresses are not updated to point to the newly merged block if the
original block was eliminated. This is causing me problems. Mind you, I'm
experimenting with this using the Sparc backend, which could be the source
of blame, but this seems unlikely. Thoughts?
-------------- nex...
2010 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] BlockAddress is a "User"
...backend. Next
time I will more carefully examine the source of the problem. :)
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Marc de Kruijf <dekruijf at wisc.edu> wrote:
> I've been playing around with the new IndirectBr and BlockAddress types.
> I'm finding that in CodeGen, during "EliminateMostlyEmptyBlocks",
> BlockAddresses are not updated to point to the newly merged block if the
> original block was eliminated. This is causing me problems. Mind you, I'm
> experimenting with this using the Sparc backend, which could be the source
> of blame, but this seems unlikely. Thoughts...
2017 Mar 09
4
[RFC] bitfield access shrinking
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 12:14 PM, Wei Mi via llvm-dev wrote:
>>
>> In
>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120827/063200.html,
>> consecutive bitfields are wrapped as a group and represented as a
>> large integer and emits loads stores and bit operations appropriate