search for: eligottlieb

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > I compiled and installed it to the prefix /usr, but that's not the > issue. Once I actually compile and install LLVM with CMake by hand, I > get the share/llvm/cmake stuff installed correctly (can those files be > included in "normal" builds, o...

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > So you're saying that the default CMake build of LLVM creates static > libraries that got linked into my shared-object and now require me to > link in everything they require myself? Shouldn't the linker be able > to track down C++ runtime for this?...

...lass_type_infoE If I have to guess, this means that the CMake stuff given is linking to the C++ libraries of LLVM when I wanted them linking to the C bindings. Any ideas? I definitely included the headers for the C bindings only. On 11/03/2010 03:30 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Eli Gottlieb<eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > >> I compiled and installed it to the prefix /usr, but that's not the >> issue. Once I actually compile and install LLVM with CMake by hand, I >> get the share/llvm/cmake stuff installed correctly (can those files be >> included in "n...

On Nov 4, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > >> So you're saying that the default CMake build of LLVM creates static >> libraries that got linked into my shared-object and now require me to >> link in everything they require myself? Shouldn't the linker be able >> to track down C...

...nents. I can use either the CMake modules or llvm-config to find the library names once I've got the component names, but as far as I can tell, there's no actual documentation of the component names themselves anywhere. Oscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Eli Gottlieb<eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > >> So where could I find a list of LLVM libraries so I can figure out >> which ones I actually need to link into my program? > What's not clear in > > http://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#embedding-llvm-in-your-project > > ? (suppossing t...

[Please CC the mailing list] Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > OK, I'm just going to paste in my CMakeLists.txt file. Like I said, > I'm building an LLVM install myself by untarring llvm, mkdir build in > the root dir of the source, cd build/, cmake .., make. > >> cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 2.6) >&...

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > The two lines >> set(CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${CMAKE_MODULE_PATH} >> "${LLVM_ROOT}/share/llvm/cmake") >> include(LLVM) > don't seem to work. I'm checking with installing LLVM from source to > see if that makes it work, but the LLVM...

Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb at gmail.com> writes: > I'm trying to upgrade my LLVM bindings in Java from 2.9 to 3.1. To > do so, I regenerated the JNI bindings from fresh LLVM 3.1 headers, and > did a slight rewrite of my CMakeLists.txt file for building the C > code. > > Problem is, cmake no...

So where could I find a list of LLVM libraries so I can figure out which ones I actually need to link into my program? Oscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>> writes: > > >/ This patch *seems* to fix the problem (cmake regexps are not thoroughly > />/ documented): >

I compiled and installed it to the prefix /usr, but that's not the issue. Once I actually compile and install LLVM with CMake by hand, I get the share/llvm/cmake stuff installed correctly (can those files be included in "normal" builds, or will LLVM switch to CMake as its primary build system?). Now I'm running into the problem of cflags or includes or something not being

Hi again, I'm trying to upgrade my LLVM bindings in Java from 2.9 to 3.1. To do so, I regenerated the JNI bindings from fresh LLVM 3.1 headers, and did a slight rewrite of my CMakeLists.txt file for building the C code. Problem is, cmake no longer finishes at all. I receive the following output, and then it just runs forever (while still responding to a CTRL-C): > eli at

Dear LLVM-Dev, Your ideas page said that you'd take applications to write new language frontends for LLVM. I've been in-progress for most of a year now writing a compiler for my language Deca as a side-project, and I'd like to make it GSOC project by targeting it at LLVM. My other commitments are that I've applied to several different REU programs. If one of them

If you don't like the idea of my implementing my own language on LLVM, I can add an LLVM frontend for Object Pascal with the Free Pascal Compiler.

Hey LLVM, As I mentioned in a previous email, I started Java bindings to link to LLVM's C interface via SWIG. They currently contain a full binding for Core.h, and more is coming when I have the time/need to write it. What would be the procedure for moving these bindings into the mainline LLVM source-tree/installation? The link to the bindings is here.

I need to connect up some code written in C to link with LLVM. Since LLVM itself uses CMake, is there a standard CMake module to find and use the LLVM libraries?

Well, now I've got another problem. When I actually connect things up to *use* the binding library I built, I run into an unresolved symbol error with respect to the function LLVMWriteBitcodeToFile(). The assembly dump showing that my library does have that function follows: > eli at eli-netbook:~/Programs/decac$ objdump -d > src/jllvm/llvm/libjllvm.so | grep LLVMWriteBitcodeToFile

So is there a C binding for functions that emit LLVM assembly code? Or should I use BitWriter followed by the disassembler?

I've been writing a compiler that was formerly using LLVM 2.9 as its backend, and it relied on the fact that LLVM's bitcode linker would unify identically-named types across modules if all of the declarations but one defined the type as opaque. The compiler worked this way to avoid whole-program compilation. How can I get back this kind of behavior now that I've upgraded to LLVM 3.1?