search for: elfreferences

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "elfreferences".

Did you mean: elfreference
2014 Mar 06
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Relocation reading refactoring
...ateReference(Elf_Rel &rel, Elf_Sym >> *symbol); >> }; >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Shankar Easwaran >> <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> >>> I was thinking of having a separate class that would return a vector of >>> ELFReferences when you the reader looks at a section and symbol. >>> >>> The class would be constructed with >>> _relocationAddendReferences/_relocationReferences. >>> >>> Each subtarget could make use of the functionality and create a different >>> type of E...
2014 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Relocation reading refactoring
..._Rela &rel, Elf_Sym *symbol); virtual ELFReference<ELFT> *createReference(Elf_Rel &rel, Elf_Sym *symbol); }; On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I was thinking of having a separate class that would return a vector of > ELFReferences when you the reader looks at a section and symbol. > > The class would be constructed with > _relocationAddendReferences/_relocationReferences. > > Each subtarget could make use of the functionality and create a different > type of ELFReference on a need basis. [...] >> Wh...
2014 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Relocation reading refactoring
Hi Shankar, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Author: shankare > Date: Tue Feb 12 12:46:53 2013 > New Revision: 174990 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=174990&view=rev [...] > ELFDefinedAtom<ELFT> *createDefinedAtomAndAssignRelocations( > StringRef symbolName, StringRef
2015 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Representation of lld::Reference with a fake target
I'm not planning to remove YAML. YAML is important for testing. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I am fine with it. I hope you are not planning to remove YAML. > > > On 2/6/2015 4:54 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > > Can we remove Native format support? I'd like to get input from anyone who > wants to keep the