search for: elf_ops

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "elf_ops".

Did you mean: cl_ops
2016 Aug 26
0
[PATCH v8 01/18] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore rproc driver
...st_slim_rproc *st_slim_rproc_alloc(struct platform_device *pdev, + char *fw_name) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct rproc *rproc; + struct resource *res; + int err, i; + const struct rproc_fw_ops *elf_ops; + + if (WARN_ON(!np || !fw_name)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,slim-rproc")) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &slim_rproc_ops, + fw_name, sizeof(*slim_rproc)); + if (!rproc) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + +...
2016 Aug 30
4
[PATCH v8 01/18] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore rproc driver
...tform_device *pdev, > + char *fw_name) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct rproc *rproc; > + struct resource *res; > + int err, i; > + const struct rproc_fw_ops *elf_ops; > + > + if (WARN_ON(!np || !fw_name)) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); !np should not happen, ever. You can remove the check. > + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,slim-rproc")) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &slim_...
2016 Aug 30
4
[PATCH v8 01/18] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore rproc driver
...tform_device *pdev, > + char *fw_name) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct rproc *rproc; > + struct resource *res; > + int err, i; > + const struct rproc_fw_ops *elf_ops; > + > + if (WARN_ON(!np || !fw_name)) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); !np should not happen, ever. You can remove the check. > + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,slim-rproc")) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &slim_...
2016 Aug 30
0
[PATCH v8 01/18] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore rproc driver
...ame) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > + struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc; > > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > + struct rproc *rproc; > > + struct resource *res; > > + int err, i; > > + const struct rproc_fw_ops *elf_ops; > > + > > + if (WARN_ON(!np || !fw_name)) > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > !np should not happen, ever. You can remove the check. OK, will fix. > > > + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,slim-rproc")) > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > &...
2016 Aug 26
32
[PATCH v8 00/18] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim core rproc found on STi chipsets
Hi Vinod, Bjorn, Patrice, This patchset adds support for the Flexible Direct Memory Access (FDMA) core found on STi chipsets from STMicroelectronics. The FDMA is a slim core CPU with a dedicated firmware. It is a general purpose DMA controller supporting 16 independent channels and data can be moved from memory to memory or between memory and paced latency critical real time targets. After quite
2016 Aug 26
32
[PATCH v8 00/18] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim core rproc found on STi chipsets
Hi Vinod, Bjorn, Patrice, This patchset adds support for the Flexible Direct Memory Access (FDMA) core found on STi chipsets from STMicroelectronics. The FDMA is a slim core CPU with a dedicated firmware. It is a general purpose DMA controller supporting 16 independent channels and data can be moved from memory to memory or between memory and paced latency critical real time targets. After quite