search for: eleased

I've been following the faq for moving from whitebox to centos (which admittedly is for release 3, but using the equivalent release 4 files) and keep getting stuck when installing the centos-release-4-2.1 rpm which says it should replace whitebox-release4.2 However this is not happening, giving me the following rpm -Uvh

All, I've found problems in my setup with the latest couple of revisions (1.135/1.136) of asterisk/channels/chan_sip.c In my setup I have a RH9 asterisk server, AS5300 (single E1 to PSTN) and a dozen 7940's, everything is in the same VLAN and only running SIP. Outbound calls work fine: 7940 -SIP-> Asterisk -SIP-> AS5300 But inbound calls fail, I see the initial INVITE from the

Thanks for the suggestion, Andre. I downloaded GNAT GPL 2007, and followed the directions on your web page. Now I get a lot of C++ errors. In fact, the output I captured to a log file is over six megabytes just from the start of the problem command to the termination of the make. I'm obviously not going to include it all here, but the command and the first few errors are copied below.

Hello, I'm registering a strange new behavior after updating openssh on my CentOS 7.3 server. Firt of all difference of systemd service configuration between new openssh-server-6.6.1p1-35.el7_3.x86_64 and old openssh-server-6.6.1p1-33.el7_3.x86_6 [root at c7service ~]# diff new_sshd.service old_sshd.service 8c8,9 < Type=notify --- > Type=forking > PIDFile=/var/run/sshd.pid 10c11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi Folks, We've populated CentOS Linux 8.0.1905 with content from the upcoming 8.1.1911 GA Release: https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR This includes only the GA content at this time (0-day updates are still pending). One of the major things we're working on is matching the x86_64 multilib content set with upstream, be prepared for changes to i686 packages that

...gt; superior performance but provides a non-cryptographic hash so I though > > SHA1 would be better here. > > [...] > > With respect to *both* speed and security, wouldn't BLAKE3 be a better, > modern alternative if we're looking at checksumming? > It's "[r]eleased into the public domain with CC0 1.0. Alternatively, it is > licensed under the Apache License 2.0". And the performance (see the chart > at https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3) is *impressive* ... I'm still not sure if rsync requires a cryptographic hash _or_ if a strong hash lik...

Hi, I''m trying to boot xen dom0 on a Compaq Proliant 2500 but so far I have been unsuccessful, I get (XEN) Not enough memory to stash the DOM0 kernel image. On a normal linux 2.6 kernel to boot I have pass "memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0 memmap=319M@1M" to the kernel at boot otherwise it hangs because of the way Compaq Bios reports the system memory. I''ve tryed to use

...r performance but provides a non-cryptographic hash so I though SHA1 would be better here. For linking against OpenSSL as of today the rsync license would need an "OpenSSL exception" [1]. The master branch of OpenSSL is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 so we could wait until 3.0 is released and use the C version of the algorithm in the meantime. Here are numbers from a ryzen test box: small file: |$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/shm/out bs=1073741824 count=1 |1+0 records in |1+0 records out |1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 0,503252 s, 2,1 GB/s Old hash: |$ time ./rsync -c /dev/...