search for: elcuco

...Which is great, don't get me wrong. But it was painfully slow, and the CPU of my machine became *really* hot unlike with gcc. The whole building process took more then 4 hours on this old cual core machine, while stage one took an hour more or less (I need to do a test again, without ccache). [elcuco at pinky ~/src/llvm] ls bootstrap-stage-2/bin/ -ltr total 262708 -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 5641794 2010-04-19 03:12 tblgen -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 985416 2010-04-19 04:41 FileCheck -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 6374 2010-04-19 04:41 count -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 122992 2010-04-19 0...

> We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! Doug, I don't see any type of selfbuild target in the LLVM top level makefile. This would be a useful way to automate the self build process. I've used similar mechanisms before on other compilers, where you can trivially invoke a three phase build (first you do a full build with your system compiler, then you use your built

Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've found it to be quite stable for development. If you run into problems---poor

...gt; Stage 3: build clang with the clang created by clang. > > Final test: compare the object files geneated on Stage 2 with the object > files generated on Stage 3. > This is the first time stage3 has been built, I am happy (up until now, stage3 was failing at the first compilation): [elcuco at pinky ~/src/llvm] ls -l bootstrap-stage-*/bin/clang -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 23594232 2010-05-06 22:56 bootstrap-stage-1/bin/clang -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 24391566 2010-05-06 23:10 bootstrap-stage-2/bin/clang -rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 24395343 2010-05-06 23:32 bootstrap-stage-3/bin/clan...