search for: elapsed_us

If you spend your time looking at libguestfs debugging output you'll see many messages from the daemon main loop like this: guestfsd: main_loop: new request, len 0x54 guestfsd: main_loop: proc 278 (mkfs) took 0.02 seconds I don't think these messages really bring much value. This commit removes them entirely. An alternative might be to change them to make them shorter and/or less

...ot;, + (unsigned) proc_nr, len); + /* Clear errors before we call the stub functions. This is just * to ensure that we can accurately report errors in cases where * error handling paths don't set errno correctly. @@ -200,10 +202,10 @@ main_loop (int _sock) elapsed_us = end_us - start_us; fprintf (stderr, - "guestfsd: main_loop: proc %d (%s) took %d.%02d seconds\n", - proc_nr, + "guestfsd: leave: %s (0x%x) took %d.%02d secs\n", proc_nr >= 0 && proc_nr <= GUESTFS_MAX_PROC_NR...

This is an updated and extended version of the original patch: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2010-August/msg00163.html This adds OCaml and Perl bindings (both tested), support for progress bars in virt-resize, and adds progress notifications to a number of the simpler commands. Still to do is to add progress messages to more commands. There are still a few commands which would be

...; + else + printf ("."); + for (; j < i+16; ++j) + printf (" "); + printf ("|\n"); } } #endif @@ -147,11 +147,11 @@ main_loop (int _sock) end_us = (int64_t) end_t.tv_sec * 1000000 + end_t.tv_usec; elapsed_us = end_us - start_us; fprintf (stderr, "proc %d (%s) took %d.%02d seconds\n", - proc_nr, - proc_nr >= 0 && proc_nr < GUESTFS_PROC_NR_PROCS - ? function_names[proc_nr] : "UNKNOWN PROCEDURE", - (int) (elapsed_us / 1000000), -...