search for: eiffel

Greetings, Sorry for the basic question, but I am trying to find out if R is a suitable platform for what I want to do... I am interested in creating simulations of distributed algorithms (i.e. team formation, Byzantine Generals , P2P communication modeling, mobile networks) that would be represented in GUIs. I would like to be able to instantiate an object for each node in my simulated

clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Fails to compile ctags 5.8 (also 5.6), specifically eiffel.c: $ clang -v -c e.c -O2 -Wno-unused-value clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix "/home/csaba/bin/clang" -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -disable-free -main-file-name e.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-v...

On 11.01.2011, at 12:02, Csaba Raduly wrote: > clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) > Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > > Fails to compile ctags 5.8 (also 5.6), specifically eiffel.c: > > $ clang -v -c e.c -O2 -Wno-unused-value > clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) […] > bool<unnamed>::LoopRotate::rotateLoop(llvm::Loop*): Assertion `DidIt > && "Block merge failed??"' failed. This looks very similar to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cg...

...;." "Grants Active.European.E-SHAPE" * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.European.CIROCCO" * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.European.InCASE" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "Grants Active.European.EIFFEL" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "Grants Active.European.ARSINOE" * LIST (\HasChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.International" * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.International.India - 2320" * LIST (\HasNoChildren \...

...Grants Active.European.E-SHAPE" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.European.CIROCCO" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.European.InCASE" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "Grants Active.European.EIFFEL" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "Grants Active.European.ARSINOE" > * LIST (\HasChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants Active.International" > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \UnMarked) "." "Grants > Active.International.India - 2320" >...

Gabor Csardi writes: > Btw. for some motivation, here is a (surely incomplete) list of > languages with '+' as the string concatenation operator: > > ALGOL 68, BASIC, C++, C#, Cobra, Pascal, Object Pascal, Eiffel, Go, > JavaScript, Java, Python, Turing, Ruby, Windows Powers hell, > Objective-C, F#, Sc-ala, Ya. The situation for R is rather different from that of a language (as many of the above) in which variables are declared to be of a specific type. In such a statically typed language, when you...

...ants Active.European.RI-URBANS Grants Active.European.QA4EO Grants Active.European.ATMO-ACCESS Grants Active.European.IGOSP Grants Active.European.GAUSS Grants Active.European.E-SHAPE Grants Active.European.CIROCCO Grants Active.European.InCASE Grants Active.European.EIFFEL Grants Active.European.ARSINOE Grants Active.International Grants Active.International.2324 Grants Active.International.GAUSS Grants Active.International.CIROCCO Grants Active.International.IGOSP Grants Active.International.ATMO-ACCESS Grants Active.International.URB...

...omething obvious. I''m in the process of writing my first really "serious" Rails app and would appreciate your advice. I am wondering if there is a standard idiom for including assertions in non-test code? By this, I mean something closer to the C++ concept of an assertion (or Eiffel''s pre- and post-conditions) than the assertions included within Test::Unit. Note - I''m not talking about error handling here. I''m talking about detecting bugs, but doing so when executing the code normally, not within a test. Clearly I can write something myself, but...

Can you please try doveadm exec imap -u username_of_the_user 1 LIST "" "*" and see if it is there? Aki > On 22/02/2023 14:28 EET Nikolaos Milas <nmilas at noa.gr> wrote: > > > On 21/2/2023 9:56 ?.?., Aki Tuomi wrote: > > Can you enable mail_debug=yes, restart, ask the user to access the folder(s) and provide those logs? > > > > Hi

This highly technical change allows the kernel to jump atop the Eiffel Tower, fly with acceleration fifty times that of a space shuttle, and ingest 15 times its own weight. Patch-subject: Whitespace cleanup in pageattr.c Depends-on: add-pgtable-allocation-notifiers Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c =====...

...t/Liver)) : entry 0 in matrix[0,0] has row 2147483647 and column 2147483647 Al??m disso: Mensagem de aviso: / not meaningful for factors in: Ops.factor(rTrt, Liver) lmer dont accept / for make nesting or splitplot analysis? Thanks Ronaldo ps. where I can find more lmer documentation? -- The Eiffel Tower <--> Feel hotter wife -- anagrama -- |> // | \\ [***********************************] | ( ?? ?? ) [Ronaldo Reis J??nior ] |> V [UFV/DBA-Entomologia ] | / \ [36570-000 Vi??osa - MG ] |> /(....

This highly technical change allows the kernel to jump atop the Eiffel Tower, fly with acceleration fifty times that of a space shuttle, and ingest 15 times its own weight. Patch-subject: Whitespace cleanup in pageattr.c Depends-on: add-pgtable-allocation-notifiers Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c =====...

Hi All, My name is Lucas, I am a student from ETH Zurich. I would like to know what is the advantage of LLVM as Intermediate representation over Java bytecode and C. Let me explain what I am looking for. I am starting a project which will re-write or modify the current Eiffel compiler. The main goal is to provide enough flexibility to enable Dynamic class loading, modular compilation, reflexion and so on. I wanted to modify the current compiler but my professor wants to re-write it. If I really have to rewrite the compiler I don't want to use C as the intermediate...

...he necessary tracing is (a) hard, (b) whole-program, and (c) therefore > not supportable without a lot of linker support that isn't available in > practice. I'm not sure how hard (a) really is. It's being done in other imperative OO languages, and quite successful there (the SmartEiffel folks have reported they can eliminate the vtable lookup in about 90% of call sites, reaping all the rewards of inlining etc. for these; you can assume that practically all functions in Eiffel are declared virtual, in fact you have to declare them nonvirtual if you want that and people almost never...

Just to clarify, primitive (C-level) generics do not support dispatch on basic classes (like character). This is for performance (no need to consider dispatch on non-objects) and for sanity (in general, redefining fundamental behaviors is dangerous). It is of course possible to define a "+" method with a signature containing a class not in the set of basic classes. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015

In general, the C++ compiler does NOT know the type of the leaf class when performing a virtual method invocation. In particular, a parameter (including "this") alleging to be a Foo* (Foo being some class) may actually be any subclass of Foo, so unless the compiler can trace the value flow all the way from the instantiation, it can't tell. The necessary tracing is (a) hard, (b)

Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >> No, please don't do this. The idea of llvmbuilder is that it is a > >> "free" wrapper around the other existing API calls. Making the > >> methods virtual would make them much more expensive. > > > > Wouldn't the class of

...creen more global references. One other point that is mentioned more than once in the chapter is how a single word by itself ("barewords" as referred to by the author) can be either references or method calls, assuming they aren''t keywords. That transparency hearkens back to Eiffel (or maybe just Bertrand Meyer''s _Object-Oriented Software Construction_ book, and is one of the truly cool (and confusing) things about Ruby. In conclusion, this chapter is a "back to basics" chapter, introducing OO programming to a novice audience. If that describes you, it...

Hello list, Is there any way to perform a block comment in R? In C++, anything in between a /* and */ is considered a comment, and it allows programmers to comment out chunks of code for testing and debugging. Is there such a feature in R? Cheers, Wee-Jin

I apologize in advance if I'm wasting bandwidth with a simple question, but I was unable to find a solution for this problem in the documentation... I've got a set of shares set up on a SUN Enterprise 5500 using Samba 2.0.4. In Windows NT, I map a drive to the share. When I copy a text file from Windows NT to the SUN, editing the file in UNIX shows that ^M has been added to the end of