search for: eieio

does anyone know of a good place to find an open source / freeware text editor? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...to move operations over the hardware fence, that seems to defeat > the purpose. If your compiler memory fence (gcc's __sync_synchronize()) doesn't distinguish different kinds of fencing requirements, and your platform has different hardware fences with different costs (isync, lwsync, eieio, etc), then it can make sense to separate the two using something like asm volatile(::"memory") for the compiler fence. It gets pretty architecture dependent though. Luke > > C++0X provides a compiler-only fence, and a hardware+compiler fence, > but no hardware-only fence, I...

What would you do with a just-hardware memory fence? If the compiler's free to move operations over the hardware fence, that seems to defeat the purpose. C++0X provides a compiler-only fence, and a hardware+compiler fence, but no hardware-only fence, I believe for this reason. See <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2857.pdf>, section 29.8. On Sat, May 16, 2009 at

Surprisingly enough, libatomic_ops doesn't define just a hardware memory fence call as far as I can tell. --Owen On May 16, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Zoltan Varga wrote: > Hi, > > You might want to use this: > > http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/atomic_ops/ > > Zoltan > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at

...h. So, we have a brand spank'in new machine to replace it with. I built from the latest stable, but when I try and setup smb.conf the same way, I get a string overflow like : # ./testparm Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf ERROR: string overflow by 9683 in safe_strcpy [eieio.xxx.xxx.com, happy.xxx.xxx.co] Thinking there was some statically defined limit, I dropped the fully-qualified domain name (eieio.xxx.xxx.com to eieio) where ever possible, but still come up with a string overflow by 3293... Should I go back to the 1.9 series ? Thanks in Advance, Jerry Queiro...