Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ehudkatz".
2020 Apr 14
2
[RFC] Removing Waymarking from Use.
...> is everyone OK to proceed with the removal ?
>
> Gauthier
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 4, 2020 7:40 PM
> *To:* Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Ehud Katz <ehudkatz at gmail.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Tyker1 at outlook.com <Tyker1 at outlook.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Removing Waymarking from Use.
>
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2020, at 11:06 AM, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gm...
2020 Apr 04
2
[RFC] Removing Waymarking from Use.
> On Apr 3, 2020, at 11:06 AM, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Is it worth it? I think it is. But I am not sure I see the whole picture -
>> are there low-memory systems that need to run LLVM on?
>>
>> I am not sure what needs to be done to approve such a fundamental change;
>> especially when we
2020 Apr 28
2
Backward compatibility of LLVM IR - ll/bc files
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:42 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Older releases are still available for download at releases.llvm.org; I
> believe the 3.0 release was supposed to be able to read 2.x bitcode, so you
> should be able to upgrade the bitcode with 3.0 tools and proceed from
> there. I **think** everything since 3.0 is still readable
2019 Dec 30
2
RFC: Refactor SubclassData
Hi,
Do you have some code we can look at (even if it is in a nasty unpolished state, just mark it WIP
and put it on Phab) ? It is hard to evaluate an alternative without the code. That said I think
that the table is a little bit one-sided. I have added some inline comments.
On 30/12/2019 11:53, Ehud Katz wrote:
> The solution in Clang is still very complicated and error prone. A lot of