search for: eht1

Hello everyone! Well i want to know, if there is a way to specify a physical nic (like eth0 or eth1) to a domU and how can i do it. The server has two nics, what i want to do is assign physical nic (eth0) to the dom0 and assign physical nic (eht1) to the domU. I appreciate your help. Regards Ivan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ___________...

System info: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga) Kerlen 2.6.18-8.el5 SMP x86_64 Samba version 3.0.23c-2 Eth0 && Eht1 bonded to bond0, 2Gbps. /etc/samba/smb.conf attached below... I?m seeing very slow transfers from Samba.... I?m not sure how else to describe it. If I try and copy a 4GB DVD image from the server to any Windows box (XP, 2003, 2008, MacOS) it estimates more than 4 hours to copy. However, if...

Evening all, First: Obligatory thanks to Tom. Shorewall is GREAT! I''ve got it on 3 machines now and love it. (Just because they are obligatory does not mean they are not heart-felt.) On my main web server, I am constantly scanning my log files for worm-signs. Requests for default.ida, any .exe, there are several others, you probably have your favorite. I got tired of doing it by hand

...255.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0 virbr-local 192.168.178.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 But when I want to ping an address from the www virtual machine I get a unreachable network message. I setup a DNAT om the virtual machine dmz. But looking witch tcpdump on eht1 there's no traffic.I appreciate some help to setup the network. I clearly missing something. Get a signature like this: Click here! <http://ws-promos.appspot.com/r?rdata=eyJydXJsIjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cud2lzZXN0YW1wLmNvbS9lbWFpbC1pbnN0YWxsP3dzX25jaWQ9NjcyMjk0MDA4JnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9ZXh0ZW5zaW9uJ...

I can think of several potential differences. ?You may miss any bridge specific traffic (STP, LLDP) using the interfaces generated by the bridge itself. If you have vlan tagged sub interfaces you might also miss that traffic if you were snooping a particular interface. Obviously you will miss any on-wire broadcast traffic specific to the layer1 connection a particular interface was connected to

Dear Admins and Hackers, maybe i am to stupid to use ''tc''. But i having logical Problems to understand the Filter Rules in tc. Common Config: There is a Linux Engine (Debian) with a 2.6.11.11 Kernel which act as Packetshaper. Two Interfaces eth0 and eth1 are installed. Interface ''eth0'' is the Firewall Side Net 195.185.185.0/24. Interface

...obal nexthop via 192.168.1.1 dev eth1 nexthop via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 ip route flush cache rp_filter is set to 0 forward is set to 1 I''ve trayed other configurations but always I have thesame problem: some packets are sent with wrong src ip via interface via eth0 with 192.168.200.10 via eht1 with 80.48.56.70 but as I know they souldn''t I make simple test: lucy linux # ip ro ge 80.48.56.3 80.48.56.3 via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 src 192.168.200.10 cache mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric 10 128 lucy linux # ip ro ge 80.48.56.2 80.48.56.2 via 80.48.56.65 dev eth0 src 80.48.56.70...

This is a minor release of Shorewall. WARNING: This release introduces incompatibilities with prior releases. See http://www.shorewall.net/upgrade_issues.htm. Changes are: a) There is now a new NONE policy specifiable in /etc/shorewall/policy. This policy will cause Shorewall to assume that there will never be any traffic between the source and destination zones. b) Shorewall no longer