search for: egefelt

Hi, I''d like to use the blktap utils from https://github.com/xen-org/blktap because of the mirror feature, as the blktap utils comming with xen does not support this. Could anybody explain why there are two different blktap utils (one in git and one comming with xen source) and how to compile the one from git so that it works with libxl ? Any pointers greatly appreciated ;-) Thanks

Using 10G interfaces on kernel 3.2 + xen 4.1.2 we''re seeing: dom0 ~9.2Gbps domU *~2.5Gbps* dmesg on domU: XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vif/0 Is this normal? Thanks Kristoffer -- View this message in context: http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/10gig-in-domU-tp5634876p5634876.html Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, I need some special masq rules to allow internal servers to resolve public IP''s which are loadbalanced by LVS - the rule are: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m ipvs --vaddr <LVS PUBLIC IP>/32 --vport 80 -j SNAT --to-source <LVS INTERNAL IP> Also I need to enable: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack Currently I do all this from /etc/shorewall/started - but is

Hello, running plain samba 3.023c on debian, I'm trying to connect to a samba share from within a stored procedure. This works as long as samba is in "share" mode: [2006/09/29 14:53:01, 5] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(309) check_ntlm_password: guest authentication for user [] -> [] -> [nobody] succeeded When I try to attach samba share manually when logged in as the

Hi, I''m trying to clarify if it''s at all possible to live resize a disk image. After trying and failing it seems that the reason a disk image cannot be resized - is that domU is only able to detect changes in partitions (eg. partprobe), not in block devices as the xvd driver lacks a rescan feature. My domU sees disk images as blockdevices - that is without a partition table,

Hi list, Is it possible to have NFS based load balancing and failover enabled storage without stacking switches? Or is this only doable with iSCSI and multipathd? I''m reading about XenServer and openvswitch, how multiple VMs would be able to use all physical links using SLB bonds, it works for networking but not for storage? (As the nfs share is mounted on dom0?) Using openvswitch

Hi, (Already asked this on the intel wired forum: http://communities.intel.com/message/185413#185413 but some of those questiones are XEN specific, which might be why theres no response ;-) I have doubts if SR-IOV will provide the required features compared to nPAR. SR-IOV seems more flexible, but I''m not sure if performance and features are the same as nPAR. Servers will be Dell M620

Hi list, Saw that there''s a patch for xenserver 5.6fp1 which should fix this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX129267 Anybody know if/when this will happen on XCP? I have the same problem - disk usage remains the same after snapshot deletion - this is in the log on the pool master: vhd-util: libvhd::vhd_validate_footer: invalid footer cookie: ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ This guy has the same

Hi, trying to pass through a intel x520 VF on a Dell R620, I''m getting in domU: [ 58.162639] pci 0000:00:00.6: address space collision: [mem 0xd500c000-0xd500ffff 64bit pref] conflicts with System RAM [mem 0x00100000-0x176ffffff] [ 58.162654] pcifront pci-0: Could not claim resource 0000:00:00.6/0! Device offline. Try using e820_host=1 in the guest config. and in dom0 (XEN)