search for: efor

...it for our machines. Are there some recommendations about a preferred distro and OCFSv2 version to use (apart from the "ORACLE SUPPORT AND CERTIFICATION" section found in the website, which seems to be only for database use)? Thanks in advance! :-) -- Sergio Lopez Dpto. Sistemas - EFOR Consulting slopez@efor.es - 976467878

is there a maiil list out ther efor shout related issues - or is the best place to post them? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubs...

Hi, I don't seem to be able to solve this regression with llvm-gcc-4.2 on Cygwin. It is weird as I thought I had checked SVN TOT and had a good build just before the branch was corrected, so am confused. If someone more experienced with debugging could have a look at this, its like a syntax error. I have tried whittling the error down but it just moves. Trying to bisect between r98185 and r99293 (2.7 pre-release1), but am mainly finding non building revi...

...:66). This works if I define<br>&gt; = the variable inside the node. Again, what am I doing wrong here? <br><br></div>There&#39;s an ordering issue when autoloading, and it&#39;s = somewhat<br>intractable -- Puppet evaluates all code outside of any class b= efore<br>it evaluates any other classes. &nbsp;This works fine when you use= <br> &#39;import&#39;, because all files are imported before any code is evaluat= ed.<br><br>However, when you use autoloading, some files are only imported = while<br>parsing, which me...

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev...

...the box was around 14 and it still sounded perfect... so if you had a dual 3.4 ghz Xeon box you should have ZERO problems doing a DS3 with asterisk. (That is if the interrupt is 1000 per second and not 28000 and its all ulaw) ... note that if you do not set the ulimit -n 100000 or something similar efore you start asterisk you'll run out of FD's around 151 calls. # (May 05) But the real scalability wall I've seen is number of registered peers... That's what takes down a box (at least with IAX). I've heard reports of a Dual Xeon 3.2GHz not being able to handle even 1000 IAX pee...

At Tom Eastep''s request, an informal Shorewall Documentation Support = Group (DSG) is hoping to relieve some of the writing and editing burdens = that come with maintaining and improving the Shorewall documentation. = The DSG welcomes and needs your suggestions and contributions about all = aspects of the documentation, including structure, content, references, = style, grammar --