search for: efilink

Hi, We have been using isolinux 3.75 for a while now, to support pxelinux and UEFI we were going to update to 6.03, but seeing 6.04 has but fixes, decided to go with 6.04-pre3. First, is that about read for a "make official' ? Second, I did have to modify gnu-efi/inc/efilinks.h for the build to complete (had to remove the (intptr_t) which doesn't belong in EFI/EDK). So I've taken a -m32 build of the isolinux.bin and now the new (to me from 3.x) ldlinux.c32 and put them in the root of the iso, replacing the existing isolinux.bin (adding ldlinux.c32) and rebuil...

...6.04-pre1, or the current (binary) packages from Debian Testing. Please avoid official 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 (and official git master head at the time of this email). These _will_ fail at some point or another. > "make official' ? Second, I did have to modify > gnu-efi/inc/efilinks.h for the build to complete (had to remove the > (intptr_t) which doesn't belong in EFI/EDK). Maybe this is a clue for developers to improve the current building status, among other things that need attention. Regards, Ady.

...kages from > Debian Testing. > > Please avoid official 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 (and official git master > head at the time of this email). These _will_ fail at some point or > another. > > > > "make official' ? Second, I did have to modify > > gnu-efi/inc/efilinks.h for the build to complete (had to remove the > > (intptr_t) which doesn't belong in EFI/EDK). > > Maybe this is a clue for developers to improve the current building > status, among other things that need attention. > > Regards, > Ady. > > ______________________...

Building syslinux against gnu-efi 3.0.10 currently fails with: syslinux/efi/main.c:33:8: error: unknown type name ?jmp_buf? 33 | static jmp_buf load_error_buf; | ^~~~~~~ syslinux/efi/main.c: In function ?local_boot?: syslinux/efi/main.c:189:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ?longjmp? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 189 | longjmp(&load_error_buf, 1); |

...test would be to build on top of > the current gnu-efi master head: There's a single commit between 3.0.10 and 3.0.11: $ git log --format=oneline 3.0.10..3.0.11 2ab1abfd26ea0a87a4fdf3d3c532544a65ae6954 Bump revision to VERSION = 3.0.11 8b2da2c2247af28bd681a9c8e3231559964c80a6 Revert "efilink: fix build with gcc 4.8" So essentially my fix to make syslinux build against 3.0.10 is of course also relevant to build against gnuefi 3.0.11. > In addition (JIC), please be aware of the potential building problems > when building with gcc 10. I have not yet looked at building sysli...

Hi, I'm pleased to announce release 0.8 of efilinux, a reference implementation of a minimal UEFI bootloader. This bootloader has no bells or whistles, it is simply a prototype with the minimum amount of smarts required to load a linux kernel (though loaders for other formats could be added). Currently it only supports booting x86-64 bzImages but i386 support is planned for release 0.9, with

...include/efi/efi_pxe.h /usr/include/efi/efiapi.h /usr/include/efi/eficon.h /usr/include/efi/efidebug.h /usr/include/efi/efidef.h /usr/include/efi/efidevp.h /usr/include/efi/efierr.h /usr/include/efi/efifs.h /usr/include/efi/efigpt.h /usr/include/efi/efiip.h /usr/include/efi/efilib.h /usr/include/efi/efilink.h /usr/include/efi/efinet.h /usr/include/efi/efipart.h /usr/include/efi/efipciio.h /usr/include/efi/efiprot.h /usr/include/efi/efipxebc.h /usr/include/efi/efirtlib.h /usr/include/efi/efiser.h /usr/include/efi/efistdarg.h /usr/include/efi/efitcp.h /usr/include/efi/efiudp.h /usr/include/efi/efiui.h /...

On Sat, 29 Jun, at 01:57:58AM, Igor Sverkos wrote: > Hi, > > Matt Fleming wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun, at 01:52:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > >> Thanks - now it crashes later ... > > > > What crash are you seeing? > > > >> I don't have the ia64 files which are needed for a complete binary. But > >> maybe that's only my special