Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "efi_call".
Did you mean:
ffi_call
2011 Sep 14
1
[PATCH] xen/xsm: Compile error due to naming clash between XSM and EFI runtime
...ch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c Thu Sep 08 15:13:06 2011 +0100
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c Wed Sep 14 09:48:25 2011 -0400
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
break;
case XENPF_efi_runtime_call:
- ret = xsm_efi_runtime_call();
+ ret = xsm_efi_call();
if ( ret )
break;
diff -r 0312575dc35e xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
--- a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h Thu Sep 08 15:13:06 2011 +0100
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h Wed Sep 14 09:48:25 2011 -0400
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
int (*physinfo) (void);
int (*platform_quirk) (uint32_t);...
2012 Jul 11
7
[Fedora-xen] Xen, Linux and EFI.
...ip, which they don't have right now).
The EFI maintainer (Matthew) commented
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-02/msg00815.html
that he would like a better abstraction model for it. Mainly to
push those calls deeper down (so introduce the registration in the
the efi_calls). Or perhaps by providing in boot_params.efi_info.efi_systab
a finely crafted structure pointing to Linux functions that would
do the hypercalls.
And there you have it. In other words it needs somebody willing to
look at the patches as a baseline and do some exciting new work.
I sadly don...