search for: efforts

[Please keep r-help in the cc: list] I don't quite know how to interpret the difference between specifying effort as an offset vs. as weights; I would have to spend more time thinking about it/working through it than I have available at the moment. I don't know that specifying effort as weights is *wrong*, but I don't know that it's right or what it is doing: if I were

Hi, I am trying to fit a logarithmic trendline to a scatterplot of a species accumulation curve. I've tried abline, lines, curve and scatter.smooth but none of these work. Can anyone help please, Kyran

I am trying to great a new column of effort data from an existing vector of gears used. It is a simple code where effort[Gear==300]=(DIST_TOW*7412) effort[Gear==301]=(DIST_TOW*7412) The code appears to work for some of the data but fails for others and inserts a NA value I also get this warning message Warning message: number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length Can

Hello! I'm a PhD student working with coral reef fish diversity in Mexico. I want to do species accumulation curves but I have differential sampling effort for each "sample". Do you know or have developed an R script that consider the differential effort of each sample? PRIMER and other programs use each pack of species as a replica without the possibility of telling the program that

I am attempting to join several dataframes that summarize sampling effort for different samples into one large data.frame/table. I have looked at the merge command, but have not been clever enough to figure out how to get it to do what I want. A simplified example of what I am trying to do: The dataframes I have look like this (they were generated using the table command) species1.effort

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Norbert Pocs wrote: > Hi OpenSSH mailing list, > > I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] > for > > FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 > > version. > > The patch targets OpenSSL support of OpenSSH, specifically the usage of > > old low level API. The new OpenSSL version 3.0 introduces a FIPS > > module (going through FIPS 140-2 validation and to be FI...

My data looks like this: X Y1(X) Y2(X) i want to find the values of x that maximize Y1 and Y2. Right now I'm getting the answer but I would like to know if there is a more efficient/elegant way of doing this. This code reproduces what I'm doing: [code] prop3<-structure(list(effort = c(0, 0.008989899, 0.017979798, 0.026969697, 0.035959596, 0.044949495,

Hi! I'm a new LLVM user. I want to start using the LLVM System v2.3. However, I don't want to spend all my time hunting, pecking, downgrading, and/or upgrading packages to get LLVM v2.3 running. I was wondering which Linux distrubutions(FC7, Ubuntu, NetBSD, etc) have required the least effort out of the box to start running LLVM v2.3. tia, Bernardo Elayda -------------- next part

...2023 at 7:13?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Norbert Pocs wrote: > > > Hi OpenSSH mailing list, > > > > I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] > > for > > > > FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 > > > > version. > > > > The patch targets OpenSSL support of OpenSSH, specifically the usage of > > > > old low level API. The new OpenSSL version 3.0 introduces a FIPS > > > > module (going throug...

Hi! I?m trying to calculate de C index (concordance probability) through the somers2 function (library Hmisc). I?m interesting on including the sampling effort as a weight factor for the evaluation of model predictions with real data. I?ve some questions about that: first of all I?m not really sure if I can include sampling effort as a weight factor. Since the weight factor should be a numeric

Hey folks, Do we have proposals for an HPC focused BoF at EuroLLVM? I'd like to discuss the current efforts around integrating Polly, parallel IR efforts and vectoriser support in VPlan (like outer loop), as well as coordination on the next steps around Flang. -- cheers, --renato

...nce/lazyness, features > and fault-tolerance, deduplicating the implementations can only be good for > LLVM and LLDB. > > Yea, this is the general idea. Has anyone actively been working on this specific effort recently? To my knowledge someone started and then never finished, but the efforts also never made it upstream, so my understanding is that it's a goal, but one that nobody has made significant headway on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180626/20c97453/attachment.html&g...

Any insight into the behavior of "by" in the following case would be appreciated. There is a note in the help details for "by" about documenting behavior since v2.7 but I don't entirely understand what it is saying. I'm using R2.7.2 Windows. I'm interested if the following behavior was a change or whether it has always worked this way. I looked at

Hi all, I have a questions regarding mixed effects models: I'm trying to plot e.g. fitted vs residuals for each level of the random effects, and i'm getting the same error. I guess this might be a problem of the graphic capabilities of R. Is there any way to obtain those plots? library(nlme) attach(ergoStool) names(ergoStool) [1] "effort" "Type"

...dering as to the status of control flow profiling in llvm. From what I can gather there was an old system (using opt -insert-edge-profiling and the like) which was removed in this commit llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=191835 . The commit message mentions "modern PGO efforts", but I can't find anything in the source tree or documentation. Who is working on the newer efforts and what is their status? If there's work that still needs to be done, I'd be happy to help out in a serious way. Thanks, Jeremy Salwen -------------- next part -------------- An...

I am curious how the efforts were progressing in implementing a union type. I am will to try to contribute somewhat to this even though I am perhaps somewhat of a beginner with LLVM(so it might be nice to collaborate with someone). I had a look at some of the subsystems that would require changes though I may have missed some....

Thanks for Anton's reply. Does anybody have an idea of roughly how much effort is required to make intel asm printer to be usable? If it is within weeks, probably I can give it a try. Thanks, Bengu On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Hello > > > system native assemlber and linker to generate executables. And it >

On 4/18/23 05:05, Norbert Pocs wrote: > Hi OpenSSH mailing list, > > I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] > for FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 > version. Why does Fedora care about FIPS 140? To me, this seems like it should be specific to RHEL and maybe CentOS Stream, not Fedora. My understanding is that Fedora will never be FIPS 140 complaint anyway so there is no point in even tr...

On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > While I'm sure this is good for RHEL/rawhide users who care about FIPS, > > Portable OpenSSH won't be able to merge this. We explictly aim to support > > LibreSSL's libcrypto as well as openssl-1.1.x and neither supports the > > OSSL_PARAM_BLD API (neither does BoringSSL, though our support for that > >

Hello > Does anybody have an idea of roughly how much effort is required to make > intel asm printer to be usable? If it is within weeks, probably I can give > it a try. The required efforts equal to ones required to write new assembler. "Too weak to be usable" means "it's not possible to represent many important constructs with masm/nasm/fasm". -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University