search for: efffects

Hi! I try to explain the efffect of (1) forest where i took samples's soils (* Lugar*: categorical variable with three levels), (2) nitrogen addition treatments (*Tra*: categorical variable with two levels) on total carbon concentration's soil samples (*C: *continue* *variable) during four months of sampling (*Time:* categorical and ordered variable with four levels). I fitted the

Hi , I open secure Session with X11 forwarding. when run any standard X applicattion like xterm xclock it come up without any error. I start my user X application it fails. On User application side it fails when "xtOpenDisplay" system call with localhost:10.0. On SSH server debug message are : > debug1: X11 connection requested. > debug2: fd 20 setting TCP_NODELAY >

Dear all, This probably stems from my lack of understanding of the model, but I do not understand the variance of the random effect reported in coxme. Consider the following toy example: #------------------------------- BEGINNING OF CODE ------------------------------------------------ library(survival) library(coxme) #--- Generate toy data: d <- data.frame(id = c(1:100), #

...bly need some kind of fixup path _a_la_ IA64's check instruction. The whole point of this is to be able to hoist nsw operations. But any form of static speculation will require fixup code in the cases where the speculation is wrong. There really is a cost to hoisting code with potential side-efffects across branches. I don't see any way to get around that. -Dave

Hi all, I put up an exhaustive model to use R's "step" function: ------------------------ mygam=gam(col1 ~ 1 + col2 + col3 + col4 + col2 ^ 2 + col3 ^ 2 + col4 ^ 2 + col2 ^ 3 + col3 ^ 3 + col4 ^ 3 + s(col2, 1) + s(col3, 1) + s(col4, 1) + s(col2, 2) + s(col3, 2) + s(col4, 2) + s(col2, 3) + s(col3, 3) + s(col4, 3) + s(col2, 4) + s(col3, 4) + s(col4, 4) + s(col2, 5) + s(col3,

The recent discussion of nsw led me to go back and review the current definition of nsw in greater depth, and it turns out that even with all the theoretical effort, it's still logically inconsistent. First, a warning: The scenario below is artificial. This is just a demonstration. Also, ignore the fact that instcombine would zap everything. Depending on that would be an implicit pass

I received feedback from some of you, saying that it would be cool if RailsCron was even easier to manage. So I implemented a graceful start/restart inside of the plugin''s init.rb. If you don''t like it, comment it out and send me the feedback. Also, I finished an update to RailsCron that allows you to attach asynchronous processing methods to your ActiveRecord models. i.e.:

The Wine development release 1.1.31 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Vastly improved monthcal control. - Performance improvements for DIB sections. - Several sound driver fixes. - Beginning of ActiveX support in JScript. - More Direct3D 10 work. - More 16-bit dlls split off to separate modules. - Support for attachments in MAPI. - Various