search for: effecitvely

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "effecitvely".

Did you mean: effecitively
2017 Sep 22
5
Effectiveness of llvm optimisation passes
Hi all, I am trying to understand the effectiveness of various llvm optimisations when a language targets llvm (or C) as its backend. The following is my approach (please correct me if I did anything wrong): I am trying to explicitly control the optimisations passes in llvm. I disable optimisation in clang, but instead emit unoptimized llvm IR, and use opt to optimise that. These are what I
2017 Sep 22
0
Effectiveness of llvm optimisation passes
Have -O0 on your clang command line causes all functions to get marked with an 'optnone' attribute that prevents opt from being able to optimize them later. You should also add "-Xclang -disable-O0-optnone" to your command line. ~Craig On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Yi Lin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to
2017 Sep 22
1
Effectiveness of llvm optimisation passes
I noticed that there is a '-run-pass' argument for llc. I am wondering if I can do a similar approach with machine level optimisations/passes for llc. Are those passes optional (so I can turn them off)? And how can I get MIR format as llc expects with '-run-pass'? Thanks a lot. Cheers, Yi On 22/9/17 15:10, Craig Topper wrote: > Have -O0 on your clang command line causes
2003 Sep 26
0
(no subject)
...ort_forward_destinations)) { debug("port forwarding to target %s allowed", target); sock = channel_connect_to(target, target_port); } else { debug("port forwarding to target %s not allowed", target); sock = -1; } This code effecitvely allows the OpenSSH server to be configured to only allow port forwarding if the destination host is the OpenSSH server itself (or, more technically, whatever "localhost" resolves to on the OpenSSH server). If anyone on the dev list thinks this is a worthwile option to add to OpenSSH, ple...
2000 Sep 07
9
Video codec
Hi, I guess this is a good time to start putting together a wish list for a video codec. I see that for audio the compression is around 10X for reasonable quality. I am sure this will start its own thread of conversation. For video you can do 40X fairly easily and the big task is to go to 80X or 100X with reasonable picture quality, say, a peak luma SNR of more than 30 dB. Uncompressed