Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ef_arm_abi_float_soft".
2018 Jul 26
3
Level of support for ARM LLD
...e GNU tools when the ABI version was
unknown. The ABI decided to define the official names for Version 5 in
a compatible way. To quote from the document I linked earlier:
EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD (0x00000400) (ABI version 5 and later)
Compatible with legacy (pre version 5) gcc use as EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT.
EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_SOFT (0x00000200) (ABI version 5 and later)
Compatible with legacy (pre version 5) gcc use as EF_ARM_SOFT_FLOAT.
I guess I'll have to think about what the best thing to do here is. My
initial thought is that it is best to use the documented ABI names in
source code as they'll be easier to look...
2018 Jul 26
2
Level of support for ARM LLD
...feel free to CC me on the PR
if there are any LLD Arm or AArch64 problems as I may not see the PR.
Just to check; is EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT the same as EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD
(0x00000400).
The ABI for the Arm architecture doesn't define EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT, but
it does define EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD and EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_SOFT.
See page 17 of http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0044f/IHI0044F_aaelf.pdf
Peter
2018 Feb 27
2
Level of support for ARM LLD
On 27 February 2018 at 05:29, Peter Smith via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I've got some downstream patches
> for v5 and v6 support (limit branch range, and use different
> instructions in stubs), however I don't think anyone has actually
> needed support yet.
For FreeBSD we're on a path to having Clang + lld as our toolchain for
all Tier-1