search for: ef8672f9

>> It depends upon the goals. If the goal is to make debug information >> post-link smaller then just using the type hashing machinery for >> structs will be sufficient. > > > By "the type hashing machinery for structs", are you referring to the type > hashing at the back end? > I am, yes, since there's no other place we do currently. >>

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > > > > Since we don't have ODR, we may have macros defined differently for a > struct > > in a .h file, > > thus having two versions of the struct from two different CU. It seems > that > > we can't assume > > structs with the same name and defined in the same

...e structurally equivalent by having the same hash. We can then use the folding set to do the uniquing across CUs. Thanks, Manman > > -eric > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131014/ef8672f9/attachment.html>