Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ef59050f".
2014 Sep 15
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][RFC]: Add fmin/fmax intrinsics
...754 semantics, but we also follow
IEEE-754 (and ARMv8) in renaming them to minnum and maxnum, to clarify
which interpretation these intrinsics are using.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140915/ef59050f/attachment.html>
2014 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][RFC]: Add fmin/fmax intrinsics
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> More generally, I don’t see a compelling reason for LLVM to add intrinsic
>> support for the version you’re