search for: ef0da9ac

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "ef0da9ac".

2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Which BTQ? There are three flavors. BTQ reg/reg BTQ reg/mem BTQ reg/imm I can imagine that the reg/reg and especially the reg/mem versions would be slow. However the shrq/and versions *with the same operands* would be slow as well. There's even a compiler comment about the reg/mem version saying "this is for disassembly only". But I doubt BTQ reg/imm would be microcoded. -- Ite