search for: ef02

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "ef02".

Did you mean: ef00
2016 Jul 28
2
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...MBR: protective > BSD: not present > APM: not present > GPT: present > > Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. > Disk /dev/vdc: ... > ... > Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name > 1 2048 6143 2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS_Boot > 2 411648 1435647 500.0 MiB 8300 GPT_Boot > 3 1435648 22646783 10.1 GiB 8300 GPT_Root > 4 22646784 25163775 1.2 GiB 8200 GPT_Swap > > > boot: chain label=GPT_Boot > OK > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...
2016 Jul 16
5
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
The idea is to boot a disk in an mbr fashion while using the GPT (not filesystem) label to detect the disk. That is useful when you use grub2 & gpt. I was in case where my nodes (100s) have 8 disks each and no guarantee of which disk is "bootable" in the disk. This way I can tell "please boot the disk that have one partition labelled "xyz"". So nothing related
2016 Jul 17
0
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...gdisk -l /dev/vdc ... Partition table scan: MBR: protective BSD: not present APM: not present GPT: present Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. Disk /dev/vdc: ... ... Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name 1 2048 6143 2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS_Boot 2 411648 1435647 500.0 MiB 8300 GPT_Boot 3 1435648 22646783 10.1 GiB 8300 GPT_Root 4 22646784 25163775 1.2 GiB 8200 GPT_Swap boot: chain label=GPT_Boot OK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ As opposed to "label&quo...
2016 Jul 17
2
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...MBR: protective > BSD: not present > APM: not present > GPT: present > > Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. > Disk /dev/vdc: ... > ... > Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name > 1 2048 6143 2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS_Boot > 2 411648 1435647 500.0 MiB 8300 GPT_Boot > 3 1435648 22646783 10.1 GiB 8300 GPT_Root > 4 22646784 25163775 1.2 GiB 8200 GPT_Swap > > > > # gdisk -l /dev/vdd > ... > Partition table sc...
2016 Jul 28
0
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...t present >> APM: not present >> GPT: present >> >> Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. >> Disk /dev/vdc: ... >> ... >> Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name >> 1 2048 6143 2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS_Boot >> 2 411648 1435647 500.0 MiB 8300 GPT_Boot >> 3 1435648 22646783 10.1 GiB 8300 GPT_Root >> 4 22646784 25163775 1.2 GiB 8200 GPT_Swap >> >> >> boot: chain label=GPT_Boot >>...
2016 Jul 18
0
[PATCH] : Adding dlabel option to chain.c32
...t present >> APM: not present >> GPT: present >> >> Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT. >> Disk /dev/vdc: ... >> ... >> Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name >> 1 2048 6143 2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS_Boot >> 2 411648 1435647 500.0 MiB 8300 GPT_Boot >> 3 1435648 22646783 10.1 GiB 8300 GPT_Root >> 4 22646784 25163775 1.2 GiB 8200 GPT_Swap >> >> >> >> # gdisk -l /dev/vdd >&gt...
2015 Aug 15
2
grub-install
Hello Everyone, I am a newbie. When I try to install GRUB2 on centos 5.2 system, I get following error. centos5: grub-install /dev/sda //sbin/grub-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot Partition; embedding won't be possible!. //sbin/grub-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be installed in this setup by using blocklists. However, blocklists are UNRELIABLE
2010 Dec 30
3
Boot Error GPT partition
...ndaries Total free space is 18 sectors (9.0 KiB) Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name 1 40 401623 196.1 MiB EF00 EFI_SYSTEM_PART -> fat32 - /boot/efi - efi system partition 2 401624 483543 40.0 MiB EF02 BIOS_BOOT_GRUB2 -> bios_grub for grub2 3 483544 2488472 979.0 MiB FFFF Tianocore_EDK_DUET_UEFI 4 17260760 17832149 279.0 MiB FFFF EDK_UEFI64 5 17832150 112197959 45.0 GiB 0700 MS_WINDOWS_7_x64_RTM -> Windows...
2012 Jan 26
13
btrfs-raid questions I couldn't find an answer to on the wiki
I''m currently researching an upgrade to (raid1-ed) btrfs from mostly reiserfs (which I''ve found quite reliable (even thru a period of bad ram and resulting system crashes) since data=ordered went in with 2.6.16 or whatever it was. (Thanks, Chris! =:^)) on multiple md/raid-1s. I have some questions that don''t appear to be addressed well on the wiki, yet, or where