search for: eeting

Hello, I use rpart to predict survival time and have a problem in interpreting the output of ?estimated rate?. Here is an example of what I do: > stagec <- > read.table("http://www.stanford.edu/class/stats202/DATA/stagec.data", > col.names=c("pgtime", "pgstat", "age","eet", "g2", "grade", "gleason", >

Dear All: I am having some trouble with date variables when NAs are present. The following example illustrates (see below for output of version): > library(chron) > minor.test <- c( "NA", "NA", "1988-02-08", + "1988-02-08", "NA", "1987-11-23", "1988-09-03", "1991-10-15", +

Hi, I continue setting up my FreeBSD 11.0 machine with Samba 4.4.9 built from sources. (Actually, OS type and Samba version don't matter so much, as I have the same problem with Debian Jessie and Samba 4.5.5) I followed the Wiki very close. Some details from provisioning: ... Realm [RW.LAN]: Domain [RW]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL,

...ro, the result is build failure as the macro tries to dereference > > void*. > > > > Fix by reordering code slightly, so we always pass > > struct page * to page_address. > > Thanks for the clue! I was just investigating a similar failure in -next. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert You don't mean linux-next? And not in virtio-net? I don't see page_address being used on void * anywhere there. > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversati...

...ro, the result is build failure as the macro tries to dereference > > void*. > > > > Fix by reordering code slightly, so we always pass > > struct page * to page_address. > > Thanks for the clue! I was just investigating a similar failure in -next. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert You don't mean linux-next? And not in virtio-net? I don't see page_address being used on void * anywhere there. > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversati...

Am 06.03.23 um 11:59 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >> On 06/03/2023 12:44 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: >> >> >> Am 06.03.23 um 11:42 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >> >>>> On 06/03/2023 12:32 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> since I did

Dear prof. Harrell, I'm not able to use the force option with fastbw, here an example of the error I've got (dataset stagec rpart package): > fitstc <- cph(Surv(stagec$pgtime,stagec$pgstat) ~ age + eet + g2 + grade + gleason + ploidy, data=stagec) > fbwstc <- fastbw(fitstc,rule="aic",type="individual") > fbwstc Deleted Chi-Sq d.f. P Residual d.f.

> On 06/03/2023 12:44 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: > > > Am 06.03.23 um 11:42 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > > >> On 06/03/2023 12:32 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> since I did not get any feedback on my bug report post regarding > >> corrupted

Am 06.03.23 um 16:45 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >> On 06/03/2023 16:52 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: >> >> >> Am 06.03.23 um 15:29 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >>>> On 06/03/2023 15:56 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 06.03.23 um 14:49 schrieb Aki Tuomi:

Am 06.03.23 um 11:42 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >> On 06/03/2023 12:32 EET Tim Evers <te-ml-ext at artfiles.de> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> since I did not get any feedback on my bug report post regarding >> corrupted sizes while using zlib >> (https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2023-February/126105.html) I >> would like to confirm that this

The February archive indexes of this list haven't been updating since Feb 8. The text file at <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2013-February.txt> appears to be up to date with all posts, but the index pages at <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2013-February/thread.html>, <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2013-February/subject.html>,

On 06/20/2017 04:08 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > [...] > It does not get a length for method 1, so it moves on to method 2, which gets a length, but fails to get the rest of the descriptor. This is what is happening to lsusb, too (tries to fetch 549 bytes, gets only 9). and is there anything I can do to fix, short of hoping to receive an updated unbroken firmware for the UPS from a support

Hi. There isn't a package httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.6.centos4 for centos4 in UPDATES repo. There is only a httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.6.centos4.src.rpm in SRC [http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/SRPMS/?C=M;O=D] This is probably a bug. Package httpd doesn't build ? Jancio Wodnik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 05.12.2018 07:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ville, > > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 21:13:20 EET Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>>>> On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart

197]: superpolka.com.ua (superpolka.com.ua[::ffff:77.87.154.174]) - error: FreeBSD with vulnerable chroot (FreeBSD-SA-11:07.chroot). 197]: superpolka.com.ua (superpolka.com.ua[::ffff:77.87.154.174]) - chroot to '/home/ftp' failed for user 'ftp001': Operation not permitted. 197]: superpolka.com.ua (superpolka.com.ua[::ffff:77.87.154.174]) - error: unable to set default root

On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:29:44 AM EET Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > With --backup in order to end up with 2 files it has to write out a > whole new file. > Sure, it only sent the differences (normally that means > over the network but there is no network here) but the writing end was > told to duplicate the file being updated before

On 06/20/2017 02:27 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jun 19, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> #lsusb -vvv -d 0463:ffff >> >> Bus 002 Device 012: ID 0463:ffff MGE UPS Systems UPS > ... >> HID Device Descriptor: >> bLength 9 >> bDescriptorType 33 >> bcdHID 1.10

Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. -- ___________________________________________________________________ Recursion: see recursion +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | |

...via "next". */ > > struct vring_desc { > > /* Address (guest-physical). */ > > - __u64 addr; > > + __virtio64 addr; > > ... and __le64? > > There's already lots of precedence or this, even in include/uapi/. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert __le would make people think they can use le16-to_cpu() which is wrong. -- MST

...via "next". */ > > struct vring_desc { > > /* Address (guest-physical). */ > > - __u64 addr; > > + __virtio64 addr; > > ... and __le64? > > There's already lots of precedence or this, even in include/uapi/. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert __le would make people think they can use le16-to_cpu() which is wrong. -- MST