Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ee609155".
2009 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] x86 unwind support[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED]
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Mark Shannon wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>>> Let's go back a bit. Your claim is that there is no need to unwind
>>> frame-by-frame, an unwind simply needs to make a single jump to an
>>> invoke instruction and restore the context (which in x86 is just 6
>>> registers). (This is, more or less, what longjmp() does.)
2009 Jul 20
3
[LLVMdev] x86 unwind support[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED]
Mark Shannon wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Let's go back a bit. Your claim is that there is no need to unwind
>> frame-by-frame, an unwind simply needs to make a single jump to an
>> invoke instruction and restore the context (which in x86 is just 6
>> registers). (This is, more or less, what longjmp() does.) Duncan Sands
>> explained to you why that