search for: edyfgq9lvajlkxzcqmcdoh4

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "edyfgq9lvajlkxzcqmcdoh4".

2002 Sep 11
1
Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple inst
...__________________ > > wine-users mailing list > > wine-users@winehq.com > > http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE9fykqP1TgTrKOOgsRAqQTAJwKX7iT8BK8xdCrz74ipWXqVyqUCACgwjwP > edyfGq9LVajlKXzcQmCdoh4= > =/uio > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > wine-users mailing list > wine-users@winehq.com > http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users >
2002 Sep 11
3
Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple instance
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:43:12AM +0200, Fredrik Persson wrote: > > > it's probably a unique instance of the app with 5 threads in it. > > > each windows thread matches a unix-like process. > > > > Is that the general way wine translates windows threads, mapping them > > onto processes? Would that really be a good idea? Usually the argument > > goes