search for: edict

...that simple. >> Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is >> a waste of time. #dictator > > > Christopher, > > AFAICT, you haven't explained *why* it is the wrong problem. Mind > elaborating on that? > > > Jon > > p.s: edicts, appeals to authority, and ad hominems are not useful for > discussion. Doing that, and following up with "#dictator" further solidifies > that you know your own argument is b-s.... please stop. > > -- > Jon Roelofs > jonathan at codesourcery.com > CodeSourcery / Men...

...;'t just a question of being a good citizen, or of meeting the increasing demands of legislation. It''s also about effectively communicating with a very large segment of your user base. Accessibility is often presented as being complex and confusing. Guidelines are published as edicts, carved in stone tablets that must be followed without question. That''s not very pragmatic. Because you are a real developer with a real projects to ship, you need to learn how to make content accessible, using accessibility guidelines as just that—guidelines. With this book, you&...

Monolithic is trying to solve the wrong problem - it's that simple. Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is a waste of time. #dictator As part of any potential migration, everyone involved must start to accept certain changes, (large or small) to the workflow. The big challenge here isn't technical, it's mindset. It's convincing any group of

...ded partner who needs it. > > Right. Thank you, and I'll try to reach upstream about this. Please > don't blame me for activating that one, I've been working to backport > from Fedora 29. Upstream won't fix it, except to disable the AD DC again. They are, by corporate edict, not permitted to ship our internal Heimdal. > > As we know Red Hat doesn't need it any more, so who this will be is an > > open question. > > That, I'm unclear on. RHEL 7's "samba-dc" RPM packages don't actually > contain a domain controller, just...

...t;>> a waste of time. #dictator >>> >>> >>> Christopher, >>> >>> AFAICT, you haven't explained *why* it is the wrong problem. Mind >>> elaborating on that? >>> >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> p.s: edicts, appeals to authority, and ad hominems are not useful for >>> discussion. Doing that, and following up with "#dictator" further solidifies >>> that you know your own argument is b-s.... please stop. >>> >>> -- >>> Jon Roelofs >>> jon...

...t one point my LDAP did have the samba schema installed with my its own SID's and smbpasswd's in it. My web app for users to change their Linux password would on the backend set their 'userPassword' and 'sambaNTPassword' via separate calls to keep them in sync. But when the edict to do single sign on to the coporate AD happened I stopped using any of the samba schema in my LDAP server. And I set each user's 'userPassword' field to something like '{SASL}per2' to use passthru on the LDAP authentication end. And I configured samba to use corporate AD w...

...ave the samba schema installed with my its own SID's and > smbpasswd's in it. My web app for users to change their Linux > password would on the backend set their 'userPassword' and > 'sambaNTPassword' via separate calls to keep them in sync. > > But when the edict to do single sign on to the coporate AD happened I > stopped using any of the samba schema in my LDAP server. And I set > each user's 'userPassword' field to something like '{SASL}per2' to > use passthru on the LDAP authentication end. And I configured samba > to u...

...t was there (I didn't see which one it was, but the libMySQL.dll in the MySQL Server 5.0\bin sub-folder is dated July 6th, 2007). Now the RMySQL library loads correctly in R 2.5.1 on my Windows XP machine. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that we haven't violated some other universal edict... -- TMK -- 212-460-5430 home 917-656-5351 cell

...dora upstream is not a good > guide here. Gods. Sorry about that, I've occasionally pitched in on Samba ports since.... 1993, with SunOS 4.1.2, I think? I should know your name better than that. > Upstream won't fix it, except to disable the AD DC again. They are, by > corporate edict, not permitted to ship our internal Heimdal. Yeah. I got that part. > The maintainers are Samba Team members, they know the situation very > well. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f29/release-notes/sysadmin/File_Servers/ > > The problem is the gap between Fedora, and e...

...RHEL and this turns it into a whole different, new, distro of Linux. That affects things like software certification, hardware support, security certification, etc. etc. It is now a stupendous burden on those of us who chose to implement it because it was "the same" as RHEL. Was this an edict resulting from the RedHat acquisition of CentOS? I can hear people saying, "Well, why don't you just use RedHat then?" I probably will have to now. But, we chose CentOS because it *was* RHEL, but it gave us more control (the ease of air-gapped repositories is a good example). I just...

...e, but are not limited to: - setting up a new internal-only mirror of the distribution - setting up a new tftp/PXEboot/kickstart environment for network installs. - Editing several install scripts to match the new environment - Testing all these changes - Checking that all security recommendations/edicts from a higher authority (e.g. the US Government), which are also based on the "version", are followed - Checking that all commercial software supports the release (most of these use "RHEL X.y", what is that in CentOS now?) - Trying to get support from commercial software when t...

...a installed with my its own SID's and >> smbpasswd's in it. My web app for users to change their Linux >> password would on the backend set their 'userPassword' and >> 'sambaNTPassword' via separate calls to keep them in sync. >> >> But when the edict to do single sign on to the coporate AD happened I >> stopped using any of the samba schema in my LDAP server. And I set >> each user's 'userPassword' field to something like '{SASL}per2' to >> use passthru on the LDAP authentication end. And I configured sam...

On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 20:53 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > I actually hope that the "--with-experimental-ad-dc" option will work > well, as it seems to in Fedora 29. I'm not holding my breath for it. I'm sorry if my hints have not been strong enough:   PLEASE DO NOT BUILD RPMS OF SAMBA WITH THIS SET. Your end users don't know we lack security support for

On 7 Dec 2015 23:43, "J Martin Rushton" <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > >>

Hi, I need to setup a new mail server and before I got my feet wet or losing in the configurations jungle, I really need some advice from the gurus here for what the best software to used for the mailserver base on CentOS 4.x setup. The objective is, the mailserver will be easy to setup, maintained and have some 1. database backend for storing user info ( mysql? ) 2. spam and antivirus

On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 4:57am, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:46:51 -0500 (EST) > Paul Raines via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> TLDR: after upgrading our CentOS 7.5 servers using Samba 4.7.x with >> security = ads and no winbind to CentOS 7.6 with Samba 4.8.x with >> security = ads + winbind all users accounts created in the last few

...ed directly." Bug #665506 [src:ario] ario: Including individual glib headers no longer supported Added tag(s) jessie. Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 505438 + jessie Bug #505438 [libdns69] inconsistent return format in AAAA records Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 634587 + jessie Bug #634587 [src:edict-fpw] edict-fpw: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [work/parse.dep] Error 25 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 655822 + jessie Bug #655822 [src:slicer] slicer: FTBFS: vtkTcl.h:26:17: fatal error: tcl.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 634293 + jessie Bug #634293 [strigi-daemon] strigi-daemon...