Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "eddbbcb7".
2004 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] An LLVM 1.3 Request
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 21:58, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote:
> This is completely opposite the way I work. If I had CVS access, I would
> do the whole change in a branch. This would include fixing all
> makefiles, moving all files, creating/fixing configure scripts, and
> running all regressions to make sure it worked. I would then check in
2004 Apr 13
4
[LLVMdev] An LLVM 1.3 Request
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Yes, definitely. I think the right way to do this is to make it be as
> incremental as possible. In particular, the biggest benefit will be to
> get llvm/test/Programs into a seperate tarball from the main LLVM tree, as
> it is big and will (hopefully!) keep getting bigger. There are several
> tasks that can be done