Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ed93df3f".
2015 Jul 10
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] New StackMap format proposal (StackMap v2)
Hi Hal,
no, as far as I can recall we don’t make that guarantee for StackMap Records. Although, since we record the StackMap Records in function order and in instruction order inside a function this has always been true, but that wasn’t intentional. This format shouldn’t change this, but it also isn’t something that we programmatically enforce.
Do you depend on that behavior?
-Juergen
> On
2015 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] New StackMap format proposal (StackMap v2)
...o a fixed-size record format, binary searching now becomes relatively easy/fast. Maybe it would be a useful guarantee?
>
> Thanks again,
> Hal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150710/ed93df3f/attachment.html>