Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "eclipsecat".
2002 Dec 05
0
Closed Captioning
...rhq.hu) has very extensive CC support. It might be worth finding out how they do it.
We looked into this about a year ago for a project and I recall there were a number of different standards, as this thread attests.
-dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Siebert [mailto:dsiebert@eclipsecat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:22 AM
> To: theora@xiph.org
> Subject: Re: [theora] Closed Captioning
>
>
> Line 21 uses chars the font is left up to the encoder.
> Compared to DVB
> it seems much more compact. It is also less flexiable as far as
> control...
2004 Aug 06
1
Fixed point version.
I have read a few messages about a fixed point version and I have some
questions.
1. Will just the decoder be available in a fixed point version.
2. If the encoder is available will it work on a 400 mhz XScale "Strongarm"
3. Will it work on a dsp? if so how fast of one will I need.
4. Any chance of a FPGA version?
I really need to be able to encode in real time or very close to it in
2004 Aug 06
1
SmartPhone ARM
Is that encodeing?
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
>That's odd. I've been able to do real-time with about 20% CPU on an ARM
>400 MHz. Here are the settings I used:
>- Compiled with FIXED_POINT (--enable-fixed-point) and ARM_ASM
>(--enable-arm-asm)
>- Compiled with gcc 3.3. (if you don't have gcc, you won't be able to
>use ARM_ASM)
>- Running in narrowband, 8 kbps with
2006 Jan 04
2
OT Which Audio system to target?
I am starting to work with the speex API under Linux. Simple question
what audio system should I target? OSS or Alsa? I looked at portaudio
and it targets OSS and it seems to work fine but am I limiting myself?
alsa does emulate OSS so it seems the best to target.
2004 Aug 06
3
SHARC DSP
They claim to max out at 1,800 MFLOPs
And have a clock speed of up to 300 mhz.
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
>Tell me how fast these chips are, I'll tell you if there's a chance...
>
> Jean-Marc
>
>Le jeu 18/12/2003 à 16:52, David Siebert a écrit :
>
>
>>Anyone have any idea if the any of the Sharc or TigerSHARC DSPs are
>>powerful enough to do realtime Speex?
2004 Aug 06
4
SHARC DSP
Anyone have any idea if the any of the Sharc or TigerSHARC DSPs are
powerful enough to do realtime Speex?
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.