search for: ec2v

...ction legislation. All associated feasible security measures are in place. Further details are available from the Privacy Notice on the website and/or from the Company. Graphcore Limited (registered in England and Wales with registration number 10185006) is registered at 107 Cheapside, London, UK, EC2V 6DN. This message was scanned for viruses upon transmission. However Graphcore accepts no liability for any such transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191023/c56dd52d/attachment.html&g...

Dear list, Given a vector of logical values, say >a <- c(TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE) Are there any R functions that can tell whether there are two or more "TRUE" in a row in this vector? Thanks, Wuming

...ction legislation. All associated feasible security measures are in place. Further details are available from the Privacy Notice on the website and/or from the Company. Graphcore Limited (registered in England and Wales with registration number 10185006) is registered at 107 Cheapside, London, UK, EC2V 6DN. This message was scanned for viruses upon transmission. However Graphcore accepts no liability for any such transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200131/6d23e49d/attachment.html&g...

...ssociated feasible security measures are in place. Further details > are available from the Privacy Notice on the website and/or from the > Company. > > Graphcore Limited (registered in England and Wales with registration > number 10185006) is registered at 107 Cheapside, London, UK, EC2V 6DN. > This message was scanned for viruses upon transmission. However Graphcore > accepts no liability for any such transmission. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200203/0abac8cd/at...

...cs, the same line of code works well on one and not on the other. Any help/pointers appreciated ? Is this perhaps a bug in rbind ? I am on R version 2.7.2, Windows XP SP2. Thanks in advance, Tolga Tolga Uzuner Cross-Markets Chief Investments Office JP Morgan 6th Floor, 100 Wood Street London EC2V 7RF United Kingdom Asst. Lee Hesketh Tel: +44-20-77773303 Fax: +44-20-77422840 Generally, this communication is for informational purposes only and it is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction...

...ction legislation. All associated feasible security measures are in place. Further details are available from the Privacy Notice on the website and/or from the Company. Graphcore Limited (registered in England and Wales with registration number 10185006) is registered at 107 Cheapside, London, UK, EC2V 6DN. This message was scanned for viruses upon transmission. However Graphcore accepts no liability for any such transmission. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200615/05f2d6f6/attachment.html&g...

I ran into an LLVM/Clang crash when attempting to do the following: 1. Build Clang from the release/9.x branch source. 2. Use the Clang from (1) to build clangd on the release/9.x branch, with LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On. I wrote a script to reproduce the crash: https://gist.github.com/modocache/ac366ca9673b93bb21e75d3e72162608 At the above URL, you'll find a script `repro.sh` that reproduces

Hi all, There have been a few cases recently where I've noticed two test cases in the same lit test that do the same thing except invert the CHECK, to show that something is NOT present. I'm talking about something like the following: # RUN: llvm-sometool --print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRING # RUN: llvm-sometool --no-print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRING #

Before addressing the CHECK-NOT case, I’m still unclear about the DAG case. What should the first DAG line match? The regex matching would first attempt to match “10 12” but the expression evaluation would fail; so the DAG candidate wouldn’t match; does this mean the DAG matching does not continue searching, and the test fails? Or would we restart the search…. where? With “0 12” (skipping only

Hi all, Many of our lit tests use FileCheck and a tool like llvm-readobj to check properties of a section header/symbol/etc. A typical (pseudoised for brevity) output to match against might be something like the following: Symbols [ Symbol { Name: foo Value: 0 Type: Function Section: .foo (1) } Symbol { Name: bar Value: 1 Type: Object Section: .foo (1) } ]