Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ebbc0eeb".
2012 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] Static ctors in llvm::Attribute
...default CTOR (i.e. no uninitialized
Attributes objects).
If the approach is ok, I'll this patch (formatted and commented) for
further review.
--kcc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120207/ebbc0eeb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: attr.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7791 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120207/ebbc0eeb/attachment.bin>
2012 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] Static ctors in llvm::Attribute
I see the problem.
Let me try to come up with a solution that does not involve constructors
but also does not sacrifice type safety.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Kostya,
>
> One unexpected piece of fallout in your recent attributes change (r148553)
> was that it introduced a bunch of static constructors into .o files that
2012 Feb 07
5
[LLVMdev] Static ctors in llvm::Attribute
Hi Kostya,
One unexpected piece of fallout in your recent attributes change (r148553) was that it introduced a bunch of static constructors into .o files that #include Attributes.h, due to stuff like this:
const Attributes None (0); ///< No attributes have been set
const Attributes ZExt (1<<0); ///< Zero extended before/after call
const Attributes SExt