search for: ebb

Hello Mongrel Users, I''m writing a web server called Ebb. It''s written in C, makes use of the Mongrel HTTP parser, and uses libev its event loop. The goal is to be small, fast, and language independent server that can host web frameworks. I have written a small Ruby binding which provides a Rack handler - this will allow Ebb to host Rails, Merb,...

...mcasp_probe line 265 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c: function mcp77_clk_read line 66 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c: function mcp77_clk_read line 73 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c: function mcp77_clk_read line 76 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 3 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 4 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 5 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 6 tools/testi...

...mcasp_probe line 265 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c: function mcp77_clk_read line 66 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c: function mcp77_clk_read line 73 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/mcp77.c: function mcp77_clk_read line 76 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 3 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 4 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 5 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/trace.c: function trace_decode_reg line 6 tools/testi...

...etails myself. Thanks in advance, January -- ------------ January Weiner 3 ---------------------+--------------- Division of Bioinformatics, University of Muenster | Schlo?platz 4 (+49)(251)8321634 | D48149 M?nster http://www.uni-muenster.de/Biologie.Botanik/ebb/ | Germany

...hings that need to be at the end of a block. If you can't recognize it, don't remove it. Optimizing across an exceptional control edge is not awkward at all because dominance properties hold within an extended basic block. Most current LLVM transforms can be easily adapted to operate on an EBB. You mainly need a slightly smarter local instruction iterator. The same cannot be said about teaching passes, and the people who write them, to understand implicit control flow edges "within" blocks. I think that's similar in difficulty to representing the entire function as a single...

...her transformations safely more aggressive, but would involve > noticeable (unacceptable?) overhead.  Does what I'm looking for > already exist?  Have they already been considered and rejected due to > the overhead involved? Have you considered something like this [1]? [1] http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn/articles/cpp-opt.pdf Cheers, -Mahadevan.

Hello! The if-converter tries to match 'Simple' patterns looking like this: // Simple (split, no rejoin): // EBB // | \_ // | | // | TBB---> exit // | // FBB The IfConverter::ValidSimple method (lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp:461) checks if TBB matches this pattern. It basically does this by simply checking if AnalyseBranch fails on that block (IfConversion.cpp:640). T...

...) !X- R(+) !tv b-(+) Dl++(++++) D++ G++(-) e>+++ h++(---) r++>+$ y++**>$ H++++ n---(----) p? !au w+ v- 3+>++ j- G'''' B--- u+++*** f* Quake++++>+++++$ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Home of Geek Code - http://www.geekcode.com/ The Geek Code Decoder Page - http://www.ebb.org/ungeek//

...inomial response variable (also known as under-dispersion). Prentice (1986) (http://www.jstor.org/stable/2289219) developed an extension of the beta-binomial model which allowed for this negative correlation. Palmquist (1997)(http://www.polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/palmq97.pdf) developed a module (ebb) for Stata which implemented this solution, but this has since been discontinued and is no longer available on the web. Is there a package in R which implements the extended beta-binomial model or otherwise allows for negative intracluster correlations? The following packages and functions do not...

As far as I know, there is none. Pretty much every analysis or transform on EBBs can be extended to work on the dominator tree, which is what LLVM prefers. Cameron On Apr 8, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Bill He <wh3 at rice.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to find a sample pass that works on extended basic blocks. Any suggestion or help is very much appreciated....

On Jun 13, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > Optimizing across an exceptional control edge is not awkward at all because dominance properties hold within an extended basic block. Most current LLVM transforms can be easily adapted to operate on an EBB. You mainly need a slightly smarter local instruction iterator. The same cannot be said about teaching passes, and the people who write them, to understand implicit control flow edges "within" blocks. ...what on earth are you imagining is being proposed here? Basic blocks remain single-...

...ject is a Generalized Additive Model. Experts caution us against overfitting the data, which can cause inaccurate results. I am not a statistician (my background is in Computer Science). Perhaps some kind soul would take a look and vet the model for overfitting the data. The study estimated the ebb and flow of traffic through a voting place. Just one voting place was studied; the election was the U.S. mid-term election about a year ago. Procedure: The voting day was divided into five-minute bins, and the number of voters arriving in each bin was recorded. The voting day was 13 hours long,...

Hi all, I am trying to find a sample pass that works on extended basic blocks. Any suggestion or help is very much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Best, Weibo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130408/5492103d/attachment.html>

...imited. My kind regards, January Weiner -- ------------ January Weiner 3 ---------------------+--------------- Division of Bioinformatics, University of Muenster | Schlo??platz 4 (+49)(251)8321634 | D48149 M??nster http://www.uni-muenster.de/Biologie.Botanik/ebb/ | Germany

...gnificantly different from zero, I trust I can ignore the difference between the estimates. Or could I? Many thanks in advance for any help. Please let me know if I should provide further info. With best wishes. Wing -- Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Littlegate House, St Ebbes, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK tel: +44 (1865) 286176, fax: +44 (1865) 286171 http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0006

> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:17 PM, Kyle Butt <iteratee at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com <mailto:atrick at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 6:53 PM, Kyle Butt via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> I plan on

...1, at 4:33 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 13, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> Optimizing across an exceptional control edge is not awkward at all because dominance properties hold within an extended basic block. Most current LLVM transforms can be easily adapted to operate on an EBB. You mainly need a slightly smarter local instruction iterator. The same cannot be said about teaching passes, and the people who write them, to understand implicit control flow edges "within" blocks. > > ...what on earth are you imagining is being proposed here? Basic blocks rema...

Hi, I have setup freebsd, postfix, dovecot and maia, but all the time i get the following error in /var/log/maillog - and i cant google me to the solution, please advice. Aug 9 12:18:49 mail02 dovecot: auth(default): Authentication client trying to connect to master socket Aug 9 12:18:49 mail02 postfix/smtpd[1356]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms Aug 9 12:18:50 mail02

...- 5(+) !X- R(+) !tv b-(+) Dl++(++++) D++ G+ e>+++ h++(---) r++>+$ y++*>$ H++++ n---(----) p? !au w+ v- 3+>++ j- G'''' B--- u+++*** f* Quake++++>+++++$ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Home of Geek Code - http://www.geekcode.com/ The Geek Code Decoder Page - http://www.ebb.org/ungeek//

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2017, at 6:53 PM, Kyle Butt via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I plan on rewriting the block placement algorithm to proceed by traces. > > A trace is a chain of blocks where each block in the chain may fall > through to > the successor in the chain.